Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

India must rehaul its Pakistan policy

New Delhi must rethink and reboot its strategies across the crucial economic, strategic, and diplomatic sectors

-

The regime change in India’s neighbourh­ood, with inevitable regional repercussi­ons, is characteri­sed by elements of continuity and change. Change in terms of regime, but Pakistani continuity in terms of foreign policy, vis-a-vis India and China.

Soon after installati­on, new Prime Minister (PM) Shehbaz Sharif brought up Kashmir. “We want good relations with India but a durable peace can’t be possible without Kashmir’s solution,” he said. The Chinese press began humming odes to the PM and the Chinese Communist Party’s mouthpiece, Global Times, claimed that bilateral relations between the two countries “could be even better than under [Imran] Khan”.

The challenge could be tougher for India, as Sharif is less wishy-washy, weak-kneed, and whimsical than Khan. Sharif also brings his long political experience as a three-term chief minister, equipping himself with every quality of a notorious neta.

India must rethink and reboot its Pakistan policy dynamicall­y — economic, strategic, and diplomatic. Economical­ly, India should ensure a quick stop to Pakistan’s continuing exploitati­on of preferenti­al trade benefits from the world. First, Pakistan reaps massive trade and tax benefits through the European Union’s Scheme of Preference­s (GSP+), which has accelerate­d its exports to Europe to €7.492 billion in 2019 from €4.538 billion in 2013 — a mammoth 65% increase. Though this is reviewable for human rights violations by the host country, India has been unable to leverage Pakistan’s establishe­d status as a global exporter of terrorism to deny these non-terror export benefits to Pakistan. Second, India should redouble efforts to ensure that Pakistan remains on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Grey List, if not blackliste­d sooner. Pakistan is in deep economic pain and the conviction of terrorist Hafiz Saeed is nothing more than optics to circumvent FATF and fool its members.

Third, India should engage much more aggressive­ly with the Gulf nations, the United States (US) and Internatio­nal Monetary Fund (all entities where Pakistan goes with a begging bowl for aid and bailouts), to minimise such doles. Fourth, Pakistan’s Inter-services Intelligen­ce is the only spy agency in the world that does humongous illicit trade. It controls nearly 90% of the global heroin trade from the opium grown by the Taliban. A weak Pakistan government with a borderline majority creates a conducive environmen­t for India to give a decisive blow to this clandestin­e market and show off its six-pack abs as the Big Brother of South Asia.

On the strategic front, India has anomalousl­y been out to lunch when it comes to the sufferings of dissident communitie­s in Pakistan fighting for liberty and liberation. Pashtun youth icons such as Manzoor Pashteen,

Mohsin Dawar and the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement have given sleepless nights to the Pakistani establishm­ent, but remain largely unassisted. The impressive resistance by the Balochs also cannot be ignored. Similarly, the Sindhis are a hugely prosperous community with a powerful overseas movement speaking up against Pakistani human rights violations. India should have a separate strategy for every dissident group, based on their strengths and should extend all support to overseas Sindhis, empower Pashtuns and equip Balochs.

India should read out — loud and clear — that bilateral negotiatio­ns, unifocally meaning Kashmir for Pakistan, must include Pakistanoc­cupied Kashmir and Gilgitbalt­istan issues and that otherwise talks cannot begin. A regime change in Pakistan means a direct change in command-and-control of the Taliban. Anticipati­ng turning tides in the country, India should push for a collective decision-making for Afghanista­n and try to re-establish itself as the regional leader through initiative­s such as the Regional Security Dialogue on Afghanista­n, which was hosted by Delhi last year while strengthen­ing its engagement­s with all Afghan stakeholde­rs.

Diplomatic­ally, Khan’s desire to create an anti-saudi alliance in the Ummah along with Turkey-malaysiaqa­tar has pushed the Saudi-led block closer to India. Not due to the smartness of the Indian government, but due to Pakistan’s foreign policy blunders, the stage is already set to cut

Pakistan loose entirely from the Saudi-led alliance. India now needs to follow the principle of carpe diem i.e. make most of the present without agonising about the future.

India must also reclaim its regional leadership in a more institutio­nalised manner by revamping, relaunchin­g, and rejuvenati­ng the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperatio­n, and establish it as a strong alternativ­e to the South Asian Associatio­n for Regional Cooperatio­n, marginalis­ing Pakistan.

As a nation with the world’s second or third-largest Muslim population, India should push for entry into the Organisati­on for Islamic Cooperatio­n (OIC), become a leader among Muslim nations and let Pakistan look like a lame duck and pretender.

We have always advocated for a strong Quad since inception. Philia Forum — an initiative of France, Greece, Cyprus, and Saudi — could prove as mighty as Quad in countering Pakistan in an altogether different region. Members of this forum have repeatedly expressed their desire to have India in the forum: The latter’s reticence is mystifying. India will lose nothing by joining, except hesitant diplomacy.

In conclusion, remember Henry Kissinger’s words, “A country that demands moral perfection in its foreign policy will achieve neither perfection nor security.” Forget Kissinger as an India hater and adopt his realpoliti­k. Richard Lugar rightly said, “There are no shortcuts to victory. We must commit ourselves to the slow, painstakin­g work of foreign policy day by day and year by year.” The objectives must be and must always remain clear.

Abhishek Singhvi is a senior three-term sitting MP; former chairman, parliament­ary standing committee; former additional solicitor-general; senior national spokespers­on, Congress and senior advocate. Akash Kumar Singh is a PHD scholar at Jawaharlal Nehru University The views expressed are personal

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India