Can’t give info if FM, CEA were consulted on note ban: RBI
APPLICANT HAD SOUGHT TO KNOW DESIGNATION AND NAMES OF THE OFFICIALS WHO WERE CONSULTED BEFORE SCRAPPING THE NOTES
NEW DELHI: The Reserve Bank of India rejected a query on whether the chief economic adviser (CEA) and the finance minister were consulted before the announcement of demonetisation of high-value notes.
The RBI feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.
The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian and finance minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.
“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.
Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner AN Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”
“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been that should views be taken then it would mean taking opinion,” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said.
The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.
The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before scraping of old `500 and `1000 notes.
“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes...,” the RBI said.