NGT issues notices to Centre, pollution board on 9-yr-old’s plea
When kids of her age are busy enjoying ice creams, nine-year-old Ridhima Pandey of Nainital, Uttarakhand, has set herself a tougher challenge.
Raising accountability of the ministry of environment, forest and climate change (MoEFCC) and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Ridhima filed a PIL on March 29 demanding assessment of climate change, inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, and scrutiny of every single case of forest diversion.
The NGT has given two weeks to respondents, listing the next hearing for May 4.
A student of BMDAV Public School in Haridwar, Ridhima was exposed to forest and wildlife at the age of two. Credit goes to her mother, Vinita, who works with the forest department and wildlife activist father, Dinesh.
“At the age of two when kids were trying to speak, she already recognised voices of birds and animals,” Vinita told HT.
With age, Ridhima’s curiosity towards climate pattern grew as she noticed extreme climatic conditions, early blooming of flowers, and uncontrolled forest fire. She browsed Google to know about climate change and learnt about various global initiatives.
But Ridhima was disheartened to know how the country’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), released in June 2008 by Prime Minister’s Council of Climate Change, identifies development as its primary objective and climate change as a ‘co-benefit’. The report says, “It is not desirable to design strategies exclusively for responding to climate change.”
Ridhima said, “The MoEFCC and CPCB should take responsibility for not proactively working on climate change issues. There are committees and lot of paperwork but nothing on ground.” She questioned her father on how to push the government for undertaking responsibility, to which he suggested filing a PIL in the NGT.
“As soon as I told her about NGT, she insisted on filing a PIL the same day. But it took us about a year to actually prepare the litigation. Together with Ridhima, we did a lot of research and background work,” Dinesh said.
Ridhima said, “When I see my six-year-old brother sweating in summers, I get worried about him. I also worry about many other kids of my age who are moving towards a hotter future.”
The PIL mentions how the ‘34th report of CAG on Renewable Energy Sector mentioned how central government failed to meet its target for scaling up use of renewable energy sources under the NAPCC”.
The alleged Islamic State (IS)-inspired module, involved in the Ujjain-Bhopal train blast, had planted an improvised explosive device (IED) near the venue of a rally addressed by PM Narendra Modi in Lucknow in October last year.
At least two of the arrested accused — Mohammad Danish and Atif Muzaffar — told interrogators they planted an IED near the venue of the rally at Ramleela ground on October 17, NIA sources said. The NIA is verifying the account given by the accused. The Intelligence Bureau has also been roped in to verify these claims. Preliminary probe revealed that the accused could not reach near the venue; both of them are in NIA custody. Sources in NIA said that as per the account of the accused, the IED exploded but it was weak and didn’t do any damage as it was planted in a garbage bin in a grassy area. “It seems nobody noticed any IED blast. Still, we will verify the version provided to us through forensic means,” said an NIA source. HTC