Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Bizman back in jail three years after he walked out

- Peeyush Khandelwal peeyush.khandelwal@htlive.com

Saturday’s judgment was a shocker as there was hardly any evidence against him. Again, he will be lodged in jail till the appeal is taken up by the high court

Nearly three years after he stepped out of Dasna jail for the first time since his 2006 arrest, businessma­n Moninder Singh Pandher on Saturday walked back into prison after being convicted by a CBI court in Ghaziabad.

Pandher was on Saturday held guilty in a case of murder and attempted rape of a 20-year-old woman, Pinki Sarkar, one of the 19 victims of Noida’s Nithari serial killings. The quantum of punishment against him will be pronounced on Monday.

Pandher, who hails from Chandigarh and is nearing 60, suffers from a number of health ailments, including heart problem and diabetes. His family says that most of his ailments occurred due to his first stint in jail. “Saturday’s judgment was a shocker as there was hardly any evidence against him. Once again, he will be lodged in jail till the appeal is taken up by the high court,” said Karan, Pandher’s son.

Pandher, once a successful businessma­n who dealt in JCB machines, suffered major setbacks after his name cropped up in the Nithari killings.

On the other hand, Surinder Koli, a native of Mangrukhal in Uttarakhan­d, has been in jail since he was arrested along with Pandher in December 2006 .

Koli’s old mother still lives in a small rickety house at Mangrukhal, while his wife — along with two minor children, including a son born after Koli was jailed — have moved to NCR in search of a livelihood and have preferred to remain anonymous.

“They came once to meet me in jail. Since then, I have no knowledge about their whereabout­s,” Koli said.

After his arrest, Koli was first put in an isolation cell for nearly nine years, before being moved to the common cell, along with other inmates. Koli, 43, said that his CrPC 164 (statements before magistrate in 2007) statements have proved to be a nail in the coffin, which will make him guilty in every case.

“I argued that the statements were recorded while I was in CBI’s custody. I never named the 20-year-old victim in my statements. Neither have her parents lodged a case against me. Her DNA matched with her parents. But how can the killing be connected to me? I know I will have similar fate in other cases too,” he added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India