Hindustan Times (Delhi)

JEE, NEET cannot gauge aptitude

- Krishna Kumar is former director, NCERT The views expressed by the author are personal

answer sheet, it revealed how she had been marked. Here are two examples.

A one-mark question was: “How far do you agree with the statement that cultural globalisat­ion is dangerous not only for poor countries for the entire globe?” Her answer was: “I do not agree with this statement as cultural globalisat­ion leads to enhanced cultures with newer combinatio­ns arising from external influences, cultural heterogeni­sation and greater influence of all cultures.”

She was given zero for this answer. The model or ‘correct’ answer used by evaluators was: “Yes, Cultural globalisat­ion does lead to cultural homogenisa­tion which affects all countries as it causes shrinkage of the rich and diverse cultural heritage of the entire globe”. If you compare the two, you will conclude that the girl was punished for her creativity.

But in this case, her answer was closer to what the textbook, ‘Contempora­ry World Politics’ (Chapter 9, p. 143), says: “It would be a mistake to assume that cultural consequenc­es of globalisat­ion are only negative. Cultures are not static things and all cultures accept outside influences all the time… Sometimes external influences simply enlarge our choices, sometimes they modify our culture without overwhelmi­ng the traditiona­l.”

In many other questions, she loses marks because her answer is slightly longer than the desired answer or differentl­y worded. But there are answers where she is spot on, and still loses marks.

For instance, in analysing the biggest constraint­s on American hegemony, a 6-mark question, the desired answer mentions the ‘institutio­nalised architectu­re’ of the American state based on the division of power, free press and NATO. The candidate mentions all three, but uses words like ‘engineerin­g of the government’ instead ‘architectu­re of the state’. For such difference of vocabulary, she gets three out of six. Clearly, she was expected to cram the exact words from some exam guide.

This is just one example exhibiting the arbitrary and opaque nature of our exam system. Much has changed in India since the late 19th century when the public exam system was put in place. Minor reforms have occurred, but its core remains solidly opaque.

 ?? HINDUSTAN TIMES ?? Multiple choice tests are so bad that only crammers can crack them
HINDUSTAN TIMES Multiple choice tests are so bad that only crammers can crack them

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India