Player-official partnership on the decline

est level.

In general, administrators are loath to heavily involve ex-players in the running of the game. The easiest way for administrators to overcome this flaw is to utilise the knowledge that is readily available by acting in partnership with FICA, the international players’ body.

A classic example where this would work really well is the current discussion on the merit of four-day Test matches.

The only way four-day Test cricket will become a reality is by administrators consulting with players to ensure they are on-side. The four-day Test match is a concept that has to be sold, not foisted on players like a compulsory school uniform.

Four-day Test has a lot of merit. Matches could run from Thursday to Sunday with the likelihood of a result on the weekend, which would appeal to television companies. And four days of play would allow more rest in between games.

However, to achieve a viable framework for four day Tests it’s going to take compromise from both players and administrators. I understand that the first reaction of some players is to retain five-day Tests. That’s basically the way the game has operated since the second World War and it’s understandable current players would want similar opportunities to their predecessors.

But to remain relevant, Test cricket needs to change gears from a gentle jog to a high-speed sprint to keep up with the times.

The first point to make in selling this concept would be to underline the need for Test cricket to reflect those changing times. To do this the administrators have to convince players that they are genuinely interested in preserving Tests and appreciate that cricketers generally desire the ultimate challenge the longer version presents.

Given a lot of thought and the mood to innovate, Test cricket could rebound in the 21st century. However, to achieve a desirable result it will require a combination of expert knowledge and solid business acumen --- the basis for a sound partnership.