Delhi’s ability to fight greenhouse gases hit as city loses thick forests Lutyens’ Delhi loses max forest cover: Report
FOREST REPORT The latest India state of forest Report 2017 shows that the total forest cover in Delhi has gone up marginally by 0.25% but the city lost crucial dense forests
NEWDELHI: Are Delhi’s lungs getting degraded?
While on the one hand, there has been a minuscule increase in the forest cover and tree cover in Delhi over the past two years, the city has lost portions of its thick forest during the same duration.
Scientists say that this is a bad sign because it is the dense forests and their thick canopies that actually help to remove carbon dioxide from the air and sequester them.
The India State of Forest Report 2017, which was released on Monday by the Union government, shows that the total forest cover and tree cover in Delhi, has gone up by 0.25% and 0.13%, respectively, since 2015. The forest cover in India has gone up by 1%.
Any patch of land, including an orchard, which is more than one hectare and has a canopy cover of more than 10% is considered a forest. Anything below one hectare is counted as tree cover.
The report also reveals that both ‘very dense forest’ cover and ‘medium dense forest’ cover in Delhi has declined over the past two years.
While the very dense forest cover has declined from 6.94 sq km on 2015 to 6.72 sq km in 2017, the medium dense forest cover has dropped from 57.1 sq km to 56.2 sq km during the same time.
“While very dense forest cover has more than 70% canopy, medium dense forest cover has a canopy of 40% to 70%. These are the actual carbon sinks. Losing out such dense forests is not a good sign as it reduces a city’s capacity to sequester carbon,” said a senior official of the Forest Survey of India, which prepared the report.
It is the open forests with a canopy cover of 10% to 40% which has increased from 124 sq km to 129 sq km in Delhi, leading to an overall increase in forest cover.
“Some trees had to be felled because of construction projects such as the Metro and road widening. But at the same time, afforestation drives were also undertaken. The new plants have not been accounted for as they are too small. They would only come under the medium dense forest or very dense forest after a period of five to 10 years at least,” said Ishwar Singh, additional principal chief conservator of forest of Delhi.
“Most of Delhi’s forests are dominated by the Vilayti Kikar (Prosopis julifora) and they provided a thick canopy cover. But over the past few years, we have been noticing that the kikars are being attacked by two kinds of weeds, which are basically climbers, resulting in their canopy loss. The water table is also going down causing death of some kikars. This could be a possible reason behind the loss of dense forest cover,” said CR Babu, ecologist.
The report says that Delhi’s addition of 3.64 sq km of forest, mostly through open forest cover, is because of plantation and conservation activities. The decrease is forest cover has been attributed to civil construction.
In April 2017, the then environment minister Anil Madhav Dave had informed the Rajya
Most of the biodiversity parks, including Neela Hauz and Tilpat Valley, along with some of the forests such as the Asola Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, are located in south Delhi.
PADMAVATI DWIVEDI, tree activist, explaining the maximum forest cover found in south Delhi.
Canopy cover Sabha that more than 15,000 trees were felled in Delhi between 2014 and 2017 for construction works.
“The government seems to be running after numbers. Just saying that forest cover and tree cover has gone up, would be portraying a rosy picture. The count may have gone up but the health of forest has actually deteriorated. By planting a few trees as a part of compensatory afforestation programme one can never replace a healthy forest. With loss of each hectare of forest we also lose an ecosystem,” said Vimlendu Jha, environmentalist. NEW DELHI: Lutyens’ Delhi or New Delhi lost around 0.84 square metres of forests — the maximum green cover lost by any district of Delhi – in the past two years, says the India State of Forest Report 2017.
While on one hand very dense forest cover has declined from 1.77 sq km to 1.69 sq km, moderate dense forest cover has gone down from 5.83 sq km to 5.47 sq km between 2015 and 2017.
Open forest, which usually reflects the trees in plantation and afforestation drives have also dropped from 9.65 sq km to 9.25 sq km.
New Delhi is followed by central Delhi, which has lost around 0.20 sq km of forest and west Delhi which lost around 0.02 sq km of forest.
The forest survey body has divided Delhi into nine districts of which south Delhi has the maximum forest cover of 83.35 sq km followed by southwest Delhi which accounts for nearly 51.1 sq km of forest.
“Most of the biodiversity parks, including the Neela Hauz and Tilpat Valley along with some of the forests such as the Asola Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary are located in south Delhi,” said Padmavati Dwivedi, a tree activist, who led the first tree census of Delhi a few years ago.
On the other hand northwest Delhi has the least tree cover among all the districts which covers just around 3.99% of its geographical area. It is followed by west Delhi and east Delhi which have around 5.27% and 5.78% of their area covered by forests.
“Afforestation drives are undertaken regularly. The saplings are too small to be counted as forests. We would be able to see the results only after five to 10 years,” said Ishwar Singh, additional principal chief conservator of forest of Delhi.
The report, which also accounts for water bodies inside forests, claims that such water sources inside Delhi’s wooded areas have increased between 2005 and 2015. While there were around 3.77 sq km of water bodies in 2005, it has gone up to 4.32 sq km in 2015.
“Groundwater is depleting. But forests are powerful ground water rechargers. The biodiversity parks of the national capital are actually helping recharge the local groundwater tables,” said CR Babu, ecologist.