Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Master Plans did not mess up Delhi, authoritie­s have

- Shivani.singh@hindustant­imes.com

would be “an ideal place for suburban living”.

While Gurgaon became a boom town, the DDA’S township in Narela failed even to take off. Thanks to population pressure and unabated constructi­on of high-rises, Gurgaon’s groundwate­r levels have plummeted dangerousl­y low and its citizens are living on borrowed water. The Narela township remains a ghost town, rejected by buyers in the absence of transport connectivi­ty.

The planners also mandated setting up of “urban villages to “strengthen the rural economy” and recommende­d “comprehens­ive master plan for the villages indicating various kinds of land uses.” More than five decades later, Delhi’s 135 urban villages are still missing on the civic map.

With most buildings built in violation of municipal norms, these are also the city’s worst death traps.

While pollution had not made it to the parlance of planning, the first master plan did call for stopping sewage overflows into the Yamuna. It also underlined the importance of keeping residentia­l areas free from “smoke, noise, odour and other nuisances.”

The plan also mandated shifting hazardous industries and redevelopi­ng vacant plots or dilapidate­d structures as community facilities in the walled city and its extension areas such as Sadar Bazar, Paharganj, and Karol Bagh. To decongest the roads, it floated ideas such as staggered work hours to distribute peak traffic load over the day. None of these recommenda­tions were adequately implemente­d.

If the first master plan failed to provide for the conservati­on of Delhi’s physical heritage, safeguardi­ng against the ecological threat and allowing mixed landuse, the next two prescribed course correction and prioritise­d all three.

The present master plan has identified six heritage zones and designated three archaeolog­ical parks for protection. But Shahjahanb­ad, one of the largest designated heritage zones, witnessed a civic collapse. Without any sanctioned plans, floors have been added to dilapidate­d heritage buildings and warehouses were built to stock dangerous chemicals.

The present master plan also notified 2,183 roads for mixed land use.

But in the absence of local planning and enforcemen­t to ensure that the properties switching to commercial use were provisioni­ng for parking, not encroachin­g on public land or violating building norms, these stretches are some of the most congested commercial spaces in the city today.

While the master plan gives a broad direction, it is the responsibi­lity of the DDA to subsequent­ly draw up zonal plans. The MCD has to follow up with local area plans or operationa­l strategies based on ground realities, and the Delhi government has to ensure that services are delivered. Much of Delhi’s urban mess is the result of the failure of authoritie­s to complete this chain.

In 1962, Delhi required a master plan — to quote from the opening line of the document — “to check the haphazard and unplanned growth… following the partition.” After more than half a century, the master plan faces the same challenge.

This time, the authoritie­s have only themselves to blame.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India