Hindustan Times (Delhi)

The 80:20 gold import controvers­y ‘Central govt gave largesse to Nirav, Choksi by taking down 80:20 rule’

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

TWEAK A change in import rules ahead of the 2014 LS election caused gold imports to rise to 553 tonnes

NEW DELHI: The 80:20 bullion rule has been in the news in recent days, and formed one part of the Union government’s efforts to deflect criticism from its handling of the fraud at the Punjab National Bank (PNB) and turn up the heat on the opposition United Progressiv­e Alliance (UPA).

On 21 May 2014, five days after the UPA government was defeated at the polls and five days before the new National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government took over, the UPA took a decision allowing so-called star trading houses (STHS), premier trading houses (PTHS), and units located in special export zones (SEZS) to import gold and sell up to 80% of the imports in the local market.

Until then, the rule had been that such firms could only import gold under the condition that all of it would be exported (after converting it to jewellery). The change resulted in a spike in gold imports. In the six months between June 1 and November 30, 2014, gold imports rose to 553 tonnes. Of these imports, almost 60% was accounted for by 13 PTHS and STHS.

Traders hoarded the metal, benefiting from lower import prices. The May 21, 2014 notificati­on of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) making the change overturned an August 14, 2013 notificati­on by RBI that disallowed STHS, PTHS, and units in SEZS from importing gold to sell in the domestic market. The only entities allowed to do so were banks and a few other agencies (and these were further required to ensure that 20% of their imports were re-exported). The objective of the August notificati­on was to restrict import of gold for use in the domestic market, and, thereby, contain India’s swelling current account deficit.

The Indian Bullion and Jewellers Associatio­n cried foul at the change in policy which, it alleged in a July 26, 2014 letter to the RBI, helped only large private trading houses and conglomera­tes, many of which had no history of gold imports, and were not interested in promoting the jewellery business. “(They) do not have a mechanism to ensure the end use of gold sold,” the letter said — as 20% would have to be re-exported — and they “are engaged in circular/fictitious export”.

The NDA subsequent­ly (towards the end of 2014) scrapped the August, 2014 change.

The 13 trading houses that increased their imports during the period for which the scheme was active are: Rajesh Exports, MD Overseas, Kundan Rice Mills, Kanak Exports, Edelweiss Commoditie­s, Zaveri & Co, Riddhi Siddhi Bullions, Khandwala Enterprise, Jindal Dyechem, Gopal Jewels, Reliance Industries, Gitanjali Gems, and Su-raj Diamonds. NEW DELHI: The Congress on Thursday alleged that the central government helped jewellers Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi make “windfall profits” by abolishing the 80:20 gold import scheme months after it came to power in 2014.

The allegation­s of “largesse” towards Nirav Modi and Choksi came in response to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’S charge that the gold import scheme was introduced by the previous United Progressiv­e Alliance (UPA) government to “favour” private entities.

The UPA government had introduced the 80:20 rule, in August 2013, which allowed traders to import gold only after they exported 20% of the gold from their previous import.

Congress’ chief spokespers­on Randeep Singh Surjewala claimed that the Modi government lifted all restrictio­ns on gold import on November 28, 2014 which helped increase the turnover and profits of Choksi’s companies by 200%.

Hitting back at the BJP, Surjewala asked law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad if he considered the scheme a “scam” and whether he would recommend the registrati­on of a case against BJP leader and defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman who, as the commerce minister at the time, justified the scheme as well as import of gold by “star trading houses” in the Parliament.

However, Prasad reiterated his charge, asking why former finance minister P Chidambara­m had decided to pass the scheme a day before the results of the 2014 LS elections were to come out.

He had earlier said Chidambara­m knew the Constituti­on and “any person having the slightest considerat­ion of democratic integrity, propriety and sanity of democratic polity would never do this.”

TRADERS HOARDED THE METAL, BENEFITING FROM LOWER IMPORT PRICES AT THE TIME June-nov 2013 June-nov 2014 % Rise

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India