Openbook exams for engineering students on the table
NEWDELHI: In an attempt to discourage rote learning and to test the analytical abilities of students, a four-member committee on exam reform has recommended an “open book examination” for engineering courses. The panel, which was formed in January, has submitted its report on the examination and other recommendations to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), the apex regulator of technical education.
According to a senior official, the report is being examined by the AICTE and the human resource development (HRD) ministry following which a decision on its implementation will be taken. The Such exams allow students to take books/notes into an exam hall. They can consult the material when solving questions structured to test their understanding of concepts instead of merely the ability to memorise facts recommendation, if accepted, will be applicable to engineering and technical institutes regulated by the AICTE.
Open book exams would allow students to take notes,
PURPOSE: The panel has proposed the concept to overcome the deficiencies of traditional exams, which “often tend to encourage rote learning”. ADVANTAGES: It is less demanding on memory and hence, less stressful. The questions place more emphasis on problem solving and higher-order thinking rather than a simple recall of facts EXPERT TAKE: Welcoming the move, experts have cautioned that such reforms need to be implemented with care. “Exam reforms cannot be done in isolation,” said Pradipta Banerji of Iit-bombay
text book and resource materials into an exam hall. Students would be able to consult the material when answering questions, which are structured to test their understand-
ing of concepts rather than merely the ability to memorise facts and figures.
Experts welcomed the move but cautioned that such reforms need to be imple- mented with care. “Exam reforms cannot be done in isolation; it has to go with teaching reforms,” said Pradipta Banerji,a professor at the Indian Institute of Technology-bombay. “Unless we do that we cannot achieve much...”
Some of the other recommendations by the committee include devising question papers at various levels of difficulty in line with the differing capabilities of students. The committee has recommended the use of the so-called Bloom’s taxonomy framework to set examination papers that are well balanced, testing the different cognitive skills of students without the papers being perceived as either tough or easy.