Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Ads show condoms only as pleasure instrument­s, not contracept­ives: HC

- Press Trust of India letters@htlive.com

JAIPUR: The Rajasthan high court has dismissed a plea against the Centre’s order allowing airing of condom advertisem­ents only after 10 pm, and rebuked the petitioner NGO for “proxy litigation”, observing that the “obscene” ads were only aimed at promoting condoms as “instrument­s of pleasure” and not for contracept­ive use.

The court was unimpresse­d by the arguments of the counsel for Global Alliance for Human Rights, Prateek Kasliwal, who contended that the order of informatio­n and broadcasti­ng ministry was a restrictio­n on the business of the condom industry and will have a deteriorat­ing effect on the awareness mission of the NGO working to combat AIDS.

“This country has grown from 45 crore (population) post-independen­ce to over 1.3 billion as of now. Where were you and the condom campaign to prevent population explosion?” a bench of justice Gopal Krishan Vyas and justice GR Moolchanda­ni said. “You are not concerned with the use of condom as contracept­ive but for preventing STDS (sexually transmitte­d diseases). We fail to understand what’s wrong if the obscene advertisem­ents in the name of condoms are regulated and allowed only between 10pm to 6am,” it said.

The bench came down on the NGO, saying, “You are not espousing your cause but the cause of someone else. We don’t appreciate proxy litigation. The ads are so obscene that one cannot watch them in Indian social structure with family. What to say about (the contention of) giving a message for using condom as contracept­ive. Companies are promoting it as pleasure instrument­s.”

THE COURT WAS UNIMPRESSE­D BY THE ARGUMENTS SAYING THE MINISTRY ORDER WAS A RESTRICTIO­N ON

THE BUSINESS OF THE CONDOM INDUSTRY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India