Mahatma’s 150th b’day celebrations to go global
NEW DELHI: Mahatma Gandhi’s 150th birth anniversary commemorations should be elevated to a “global celebration” using the United Nations and other multilateral platforms, President Ram Nath Kovind said Wednesday, as he chaired a meeting of a national panel for the event.
Eight chief ministers, Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, Left Front leaders, and Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra were among the participants conspicuous by their absence at the meeting hosted at the Rashtrapati Bhavan.
Suggestions at the first meeting of the National Committee for Gandhi’s 150th birth anniversary celebrations ranged from “specific measures to help farmers, to travelling exhibitions and creating infrastructure and linkages in specific locations and states associated with Mahatma Gandhi,” a Rashtrapati Bhavan release said.
Pitching for internal celebrations of Gandhi’s 150th birth anniversary, which takes place in 2019, Kovind said Gandhi does not belong to India alone but “remains one of India’s greatest gifts to humankind and his name finds resonance across the continents”. “Mahatma Gandhi was the most influential Indian of the 20th century. He was the inspiration for our largely non-violent, inclusive and democratic freedom struggle. He remains the ethical benchmark against which we test public men and women, political ideas and government policies,” Kovind said.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi suggested that programmes should revolve around the theme of “Gandhi in action” and include use of technology “so that the whole world can take note and participate”.
“He called for the celebrations to move beyond government events and take the shape of a mass movement - or Jan Bhagidaari,” said the release.
Even as chief ministers such as Nitish Kumar ( Bihar) and Mamata Banerjee (West Bengal) spoke at the event, four southern chief ministers—chandrababu Naidu, K Chandrasekhar Rao, Pinarai Vijayan and Siddarama- iah gave the event a miss. Chief ministers of Punjab, Tripura, Meghalaya and Mizoram also couldn’t attend the event.
UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi and Congress president Rahul Gandhi, former Prime Minister HD Deveowda, CPIM chief Sitaram Yechury, CPI general secretary Sudhakar Reddy and Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge couldn’t come. Similarly, former UN secretary generals Kofi Annan and Ban Ki-moon, former US Vice-president Al Gore and Archbishop Desmond Tutu were among the foreign participants not present.
The meeting also decided that the focus should be on “tangible, actionable legacies that will make a difference to the lives of ordinary people” and a smaller executive committee would be set up to take things forward. Those who agree with the Indian stance suggest SAARC is anyway a moribund organisation ; its summits are mere photo-ops; Pakistan’s commitment to regional integration is quite hollow; and India should focus on cooperation, but through the bilateral route or even the multilateral route, rather than the SAARC route.officials also argue that at a time when Indian diplomatic efforts are focused on isolating Pakistan internationally on the question of its support to terror, it would be counter-productive to let Islamabad earn international legitimacy by hosting such a summit. There is an unstated argument too - it would not be politically prudent for PM Narendra Modi to visit Pakistan in the run up to the elections.
But others, who advocate a more proactive approach towards SAARC and believe India should participate in the summit, have a set of counter-arguments. One, SAARC may be weak and ineffective but it remains the only organisa- tional platform for the entire region; it gives a chance to all leaders to get together and both formally and informally cement ties; incremental as it may be, it also helps advance the cause of regional cooperation, in which South Asia sorely lags behind any other regional groupings. Two, they suggest that the stance is counter-productive for India too, for SAARC holds greater importance for smaller neighbours. Last time, India was successful in isolating Pakistan, but they say that Delhi must prevent a situation where it becomes isolated in the region on the question of SAARC. And finally, if the policy goal is getting Pakistan to end state support to terror, is non participation in SAARC a useful lever at all? Could participation and more engagement actually be more helpful?
Even as some critics believe that India may not have chosen the wisest course, New Delhi’s establishment is clear — this is not the time for SAARC.