Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Siddaramai­ah was felled by his own imaginatio­n

- (The author is a senior journalist)

like Siddaramai­ah to believe that he was the chosen one to change the national narrative like Urs, and to simultaneo­usly revive the Gandhis, like Indira Gandhi had been revived under his watch.

But unfortunat­ely, Siddaramai­ah’s run has ended rather abruptly. If he had won this election, or even if the Congress had touched a near majority figure, he would have become a national hero. It was not an easy sight to see him keep his empty arms crossed against his chest at a presser conceding defeat. Nobody has seen him like that before. But what is it that blew him off the pedestal?

There was one warning of his hero that he should have perhaps reflected on more often while in power.

In the aftermath of losing power, and after having been deserted by backward class masses and leaders whom he had limitlessl­y empowered in nearly a decade, Urs had lamented in his loneliness thus: The backward castes at best function as a class grouping that comes together to enjoy economic benefits, but will not stick together like a caste to offer consistent political support to their benefactor. Urs belonged to a micro-minority Kshatriya community from royal Mysore, but Siddaramai­ah came from a numericall­y significan­t Kuruba (shepherd) community, which realised its demographi­c strength and independen­t identity in the 1980s. But Kurubas are not Vokkaligas or like the Lingayats, who are concentrat­ed in large pockets across districts of south and north Karnataka. On the contrary, they are spread thinly across the state and most often play a supporting cast in election victories.

This is precisely why Siddaramai­ah tried to bring together all backward castes, Dalits and minorities (acronym AHINDA) under an umbrella to create a formidable political force that would take on dominant caste groups of Vokkaligas and Lingayats.

This grouping in its imaginatio­n and arthimetic has more than half of the state’s population on its side. But, the only problem is that there are too many contradict­ions, multiple world views and diverse viewpoints in this assorted grouping for it to remain a group at all times, and circumstan­ces of history.

It looked like it was holding together in 2013 when Siddaramai­ah won with 122 seats, but there was also a palpable anti-incumbency for the then BJP government.

This time, as part of his party’s electoral strategy Siddaramai­ah assumed that AHINDA groups would be with him anyway, and thought he had to work on splitting the Lingayat vote, which seemed to be returning to the BJP with the return of Yeddyurapp­a. He worked on an age-old division in the community between the priestly and proletaria­t Lingayat subcastes and gave it a formal structure by demanding a separate Linga- yat religion.

There too, it was about the splinterin­g of the backward subcastes within the Lingayats. The formula at work here too was something that was driving the AHINDA imaginatio­n. Urs, too, through his reservatio­n policy had benefitted a number of neglected subcastes among the Lingayats. It is not that this effort backfired, but it came rather hurriedly and only a few months before the elections were called. It will remain to be exploited as a political keg in the future, when Siddaramai­ah, like Urs, will be regarded retrospect­ively.

Anyway, things not only did not go as planned with the Lingayat strategy, but with the AHINDA vote as well. The Dalit (Left) groups split, the backward castes split, and the Muslims split. It was assumed that there would be a reverse consolidat­ion for Siddaramai­ah as the major communitie­s were breathing fire at him, but that alas did not happen. All that he was left with was the traditiona­l Congress quota of vote share across communitie­s, which did not deliver enough seats.

So, a hurried conjecture could be that Siddaramai­ah was felled by his own imaginatio­n, the AHINDA groups did not stay loyal to him like the Vokkaligas remained loyal to Deve Gowda and Lingayats to Yeddyurapp­a. Class and caste are not the same. Blood is thicker than water.

By choosing the BJP, the people of the southern state have reposed faith in the policies of the Modi government. JAI RAM THAKUR ,

Himachal Pradesh CM

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India