Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Let our 2nd bid for Essar be opened: Numetal to NCLAT

- Aditi Singh aditi.s@livemint.com

NEWDELHI: Numetal Ltd on Thursday asked the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to direct Essar Steel Ltd’s bankruptcy resolution profession­al to open its ₹37,000 crore bid made in the second round of auction for the debt-ridden steel maker. Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Numetal, informed the appellate tribunal that its second offer was “much higher” (than its first bid) and sought maximisati­on of asset value.

“Let the second bid be open..let there be competitio­n”, Rohtagi said.

Apart from Numetal and Arcelormit­tal India Pvt. Ltd, Vedanta Ltd also participat­ed in the second round of bidding, the court was informed.

The appellate tribunal allowed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Ahmedabad bench to extend the corporate insolvency resolution for Essar Steel, in case of pendency of appeal.

The resolution period deadline for Essar Steel is May 28.

Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Arcelormit­tal India, said the second round of bidding was “infructuou­s” as the company had already cleared the ₹7,000 crore debt for related companies Uttam Galva Steels Ltd and KSS Petron Pvt. Ltd, thus curing their disqualifi­cation from the first round of bidding. An NCLAT bench headed by Justice S J Mukhopadhy­ay was hear- ing a batch of cross-appeals concerning disqualifi­ed resolution plans by Arcelormit­tal and Numetal for Essar Steel.

On April 19, the NCLT Ahmed- abad bench had set aside the first round of bidding for Essar Steel, on the ground that the committee of creditors and the insolvency resolution profession­al (IRP) did not follow the procedure prescribed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

The tribunal, however, allowed the two final resolution applicants—arcelormit­tal and Numetal—to cure their ineligibil­ity under Section 29A.

While Arcelormit­tal was disqualifi­ed for its relation to debt ridden Uttam Galva and KSS Petron, Mauritius-based Numetal, was disqualifi­ed for being indirectly held by Essar promoters, the Ruia family.

 ??  ?? The firm said its second offer was ‘much higher’ that the first and sought maximisati­on of asset value
The firm said its second offer was ‘much higher’ that the first and sought maximisati­on of asset value

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India