Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Innovation in education can deliver better results

Investment in lowcost, highimpact education that will make students more productive is vital for India

- Bjorn Lomborg is president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, and Saleema Razvi is senior research advisor for India Consensus The views expressed are personal Inner Voice comprises contributi­ons from our readers The views expressed are personal Innervoi

To achieve its full potential, it is crucial that India enacts education reforms to enhance human capital. Government policies have so far lifted school enrolment and retention rates, but new research starkly shows that the focus must shift to interventi­ons that will deliver greater benefits at the lowest cost.

While more children are staying in school for longer, Pratham reports show learning outcomes are plunging: in 2005, 49% of grade 5 students could do division; by 2016, it was 26%. Only half of the children in grade 5 can read a grade 2 textbook. Commission­ed by Tata Trusts and Copenhagen Consensus, Rajesh Chakrabart­i, Kushal Sagar Prakash and Mansi Arora of Sunay Policy Advisory have examined the efficiency of various education policies.

First, they looked at two interventi­ons consistent with the Right to Education Act: in-service teacher training, and reducing pupil-teacher ratios. The authors found that even lengthy, in-depth tertiary courses and pre-service training of teachers have zero to modest effects on student learning outcomes, so it seems very unlikely that in-service training, which only occurs for a few days each year, would achieve any more. Using Rajasthan as an example — training costs just ₹574 per student annually — they concluded the policy is unlikely to generate benefits in student outcomes that are worth any more than the cost. Likewise, an analysis found that halving the pupil-teacher ratio in Rajasthan is expensive compared to other approaches, costing ₹17,368 per student, generating benefits to learning outcomes that, in an optimistic scenario, are worth five-times the costs.

These two approaches compare unfavourab­ly with ideas that aren’t official government policy but have been tested across India. The first is providing performanc­e-

One day, I blurted out my predicamen­t to one of my colleagues. He patiently listened and came up with solutions. Sharing of the problem eventually led to reconcilia­tion in my family life.

Now, when I reflect upon that unpleasant phase of my life, I conclude that it was my friend’s suggestion­s and support which made me change my rigid and parochial thinking, leading to the resolution of the problem. Even the great physicist Albert Einstein had remarked, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we based incentives to teachers: paying teachers more when learning outcomes improve the most. A trial in Andhra Pradesh cost ₹552 per student per year, resulted in better student test scores, with no evidence of any adverse consequenc­es. Test score gains are linked to higher productivi­ty in adulthood, and the researcher­s calculated the net effect as a 7.3% boost to students’ wages. These benefits to society are worth 24 times more than the costs of the interventi­on.

Next, it examined ‘teaching at the right level’, which does away with grade-level curriculum and involves organising children into groups based on their learning levels. Pioneered by Pratham in India, it is deployed in two ways. The first approach involves running intensive camps, usually 80-100 hours long, with trained Pratham staff and community volunteers. The second approach involves government interventi­on at scale across one or more districts. Depending on the approach, the interventi­on can generate benefits to students’ incomes worth at least 19 times the costs, and up to 50 times the costs.

Finally, the authors examined computer-assisted learning, to help students learn at their own level. Mindspark is one such personalis­ed technology interventi­on, implemente­d in a rigorously measured program over five months in three low-income schools in Delhi. Adapting this programme for 50 schools, including infrastruc­ture, hardware, staffing and software developmen­t, would cost about ₹1,333 per student over five months. Several studies into Mindspark have shown improvemen­ts in student test scores, and have revealed that there may be large returns to further innovation and research on effective ways of integratin­g technology-aided instructio­n into classrooms. After five months of access, one robust study showed students scoring 14% higher in mathematic­s and 9% higher in Hindi relative to the students who didn’t have access to Mindspark.

Research shows how much future wages are influenced by higher test scores. With these results, they found that on average each student will make ₹98,825 more over their lifetime. Spending just ₹1,333 per student to achieve such an impressive result means every rupee spent would generate benefits to society worth ₹74.

It is policies like these that India must embrace, to fully reap its demographi­c dividend. Getting children into classrooms is no longer enough. Investment in low-cost, high-impact education that will make students more productive is vital.

GOVERNMENT POLICIES HAVE SO FAR LIFTED SCHOOL ENROLMENT AND RETENTION, BUT RESEARCH SHOWS THAT THE FOCUS MUST SHIFT TO INTERVENTI­ONS THAT WILL DELIVER BENEFITS AT THE LOWEST COST.

used when we created them.” Whenever unable to deal with problems on your own, always discuss it with those you can rely on. But, at the same time, be selective with whom you share your problems because everyone will not and cannot help you. Sharing of problems with the right person will surely put things back on track.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India