Assam NRC
In Delhi, the central government said there is no need to panic and that those excluded from the draft will not be declared foreigners immediately, as such powers are vested only with tribunals.
Union home minister Rajnath Singh said: “No coercive action will be taken against anyone. Hence, there is no need for anyone to panic. This is a draft and not the final list. Even someone whose name is not in the final list can approach the foreigners tribunal.” He added that some people are unnecessarily trying to create an atmosphere of fear.
“I want to assure all that there is no need for any apprehension or fear. Some misinformation is also being spread. The NRC process has been done impartially,” Singh said.
Political opponents of the BJP government in the state and the Bjp-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the Centre were quick to find fault with the exercise.
Congress president Rahul Gandhi said the BJP government’s execution of NRC was tardy. The government should move swiftly to resolve the crisis in Assam after reports that the names of many Indian citizens are missing in the draft National Register of Citizens, Gandhi said. In a Facebook post, Gandhi said the NRC was initiated by the UPA under Manmohan Singh to fulfil the commitment made in the Assam Accord of 1985. “However, the manner in which this exercise has been undertaken by the BJP Governments at the centre and in the State of Assam leaves much to be desired,” he said.
West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee hit out at the Centre, accusing it of resorting to “vote bank politics”. “This divide and rule policy will finish the country,” she said at a press conference in Kolkata, alleging it was a “game plan” to isolate and “throw out of the state” Bengali speaking people and Biharis.
Minister (independent charge) for development of north-eastern region Dr Jitendra Singh alleged that Congress and TMC are trying to make an issue where there is none as the whole exercise was monitored by the Supreme Court and it started during the United Progressive Alliance regime.
“The NDA government is just taking it forward. There is an effort to create political instability in the region as Congress has been politically wiped out from the North-east and the TMC is facing challenge from the BJP in West Bengal,” he added.
Interestingly, the Congress’s local unit struck a more conciliatory note. It welcomed publication of the list, but expressed surprise at the large number of applicants excluded. State Congress chief Ripun Bora said names of many may have been kept out due to minor discrepancies in the documents submitted to provide citizenship.
“The fact that names of 4 million applicants are missing from the complete draft is not a small thing. But they can file claims to get names enlisted. We all want an error-free NRC that keeps foreigners out,” said Badruddin Ajmal, a Lok Sabha MP and president of All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF).
Ajmal’s own named was missing from the first draft of NRC released on December 31 but finds mention in the list released on Monday.
“Release of the complete draft is the outcome of a 38-year-long struggle that started with the Assam Agitation in 1979. The updated NRC is a big step towards solving the issue of illegal immigration to Assam,” said Samujjal Bhattacharya, advisor to All Assam Students Union (AASU). Abhijeet Sharma of Assam Public Works (APW), an NGO, whose writ petition to the Supreme Court in 2009 led to the start of the NRC updating process in 2013, cautiously welcome publication of the complete draft
“I would say we have achieved only 40% success. Only when all claims and objections of those 40 lakh whose names are missing are settled, the complete NRC list published and names of foreigners removed can we claim complete success,” he told journalists.
Ahead of the publication of the list, there were fears that most of those excluded would be from the minority community.
A senior home ministry official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the move to update the NRC is a “secular exercise” and no particular community was targeted.
There were fears that the exclusions would result in some violence in the state but these proved unfounded.
“It is a historic moment for Assam. There’s no need for those whose names are missing to worry as they can file claims. I appeal to all citizens to maintain peace and tranquillity,” chief minister Sarbananda Sonowal said.
“No single incident of violence or unrest related to NRC has been reported from anywhere in the state. We thank the people for cooperating and are monitoring the situation,” Assam Police DGP Kuladhar Saikia said.
Perhaps in a move aimed at keeping the peace the districtwise numbers weren’t released.
“We are not disclosing the district wise percentages of applicants whose names are missing as yet. It might lead to tension,” Hajela said.
Under the claims and objections exercise, three types of forms—claims, objections, corrections—can be availed after August 7. People can submit these forms from August 30 to September 28.
On the ground, though, it was a day of disappointment for some and joy for many.
Mohd. Azmal Hoque, a retired junior commissioned officer (JCO) of the Indian Army, was among the 4 million applicants who found his name missing. The 50-year-old, who retired after 30 years of service to the country, hit the headlines last year when he was summoned by a foreigners tribunal to prove that he was an Indian citizen.
Haque managed to get relief from the tribunal after submitting his documents and was declared an Indian. But he was surprised on Monday to find his name and many of his family members missing from the complete draft.
“I was surprised that my name, my son and daughter’s names were missing from the list. My wife and mother’s names were in the list. My elder brother’s family is in the list, while all members of the younger brother’s family have been left out,” he said.
BJP MLA from Borkhola, Kishore Nath, was a relieved man as his name and the names of his family members were in the complete draft. The legislator and six of his family members were summoned by a foreigners tribunal in May to prove citizenship. “My name as well as those of my family members are in the complete draft. Our names were in the first draft as well, but since we had been summoned by the foreigners tribunal, there was apprehension of being left out,” Nath said. Among those who are included in the list is Paresh Baruah, commander-in-chief of United Libertaion Front of Assam (Independent), the antitalk faction of the banned outfit. Names of his wife and two sons were, however, missing. investigating its presence in different kinds of tissues and animals.
Apart from the novelty of the finding, it is significant for the understanding of epithelial organs and will contribute to the field of tissue engineering specifically development of artificial organs.
The paper titled “Scutoids are a geometrical solution to the three-dimensional packing of epithelia,” was published in Nature
Ross said the new status would provide India “greater supply chain efficiency, both for defence, and for other high-tech products”, the lack of which affected nearly $9.7 billion worth of goods India could have exported from the US over the last seven years.
The US has given STA-1 to only 36 countries most of whom are NATO or key NON-NATO allies. The secretary said that the elevated status reflects India’s status as a major defence partner. It was one of the measures the two countries were discussing to advance ties after the US declared India a “major defence partner”, a designation that America has not shared with any other country.
“It’s significant,” said Benjamin Schwartz, a former defence department official who is now with the Us-india Business Council. “Looking at current exports from the US to India, 50% of those are eligible now under STA-1. This can free up $2.1 billion in trade, make US exporters more competitive in the global marketplace, help provide India more advanced US technology.”
Richard Rossow of the Center for Strategic International Studies said, “It underscores our deepening security relationship, and weakens India’s lingering concerns about U.S. reliability as a security partner. The timing is also significant. Our nations will have their first 2+2 in Delhi in early September. This should help thaw the environment a bit, after a string of bad news and negative allegations on the trade front.” “This is a win-win for both countries,” said Mukesh Aghi, head of the Us-india Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF). “It also helps India in upgrading its defense requirement and also helps India in building a very strong defense ecosystem.”
There was no immediate comment from the ministry of external affairs.
Speaking abut the administration’s Indo-pacific vision, Pompeo had sought to individually draw out US ties with countries in the region going back in time. “The US commitment to a free and open Indo-pacific is deeply rooted,” he said, adding, “The State Department, which I represent, established a consular presence in Kolkata – then called Calcutta – in 1794.”
He went to speak more about US links with India. “We helped establish the first Indian Institute of Technology, along with 14 regional engineering colleges and eight agricultural universities all across India,” he said, as he recalled these endeavors to highlight the collaborative nature of partnership US was seeking.
Pompeo set up the difference with China, which has caused worries in the region with the aggressive marketing of its OBOR initiative that has threatened the sovereignty of nations through predatory financing system. But he emphasised that the system the Trump administration was seeking “excludes no nation”.
He said: “We seek to work with anyone to promote a free and open Indo-pacific, so long as that cooperation adheres to the highest standards that our citizens demand”. He added: “The United States is committed to growing our presence in the region because we want Americans and all people of the Indo-pacific to share in the economic growth of 2020, 2030, 2040, and beyond.” city. Over 1000 such industries still operate in TTZ.
The Archeological Survey of India’s counsel ADN Rao indicated that as far as the monument itself is concerned, the ASI is the agency in charge.
Dissatisfied with the working of the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) Authority, environmentalist, M C Mehta, a petitioner in the case, made an argument for setting up a special body in place of the TTZ.
Last week, the the Supreme Court was irked by the lack of coordination between various agencies of the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government over maintenance of the Taj Mahal and pulled up the two governments asking who was responsible to look after the monument.