Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Manipur encounter: SC no to plea on judges’ recusal

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE OFFICERS , MUKUL ROHATGI CONTENDED THAT THE OBSERVATIO­NS OF THE COURT PREVIOUSLY MADE THE OFFICERS THINK THAT THERE WAS A BIAS AGAINST THEM

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an applicatio­n filed by over 700 serving and retired army personnel seeking the recusal of two judges from hearing the Manipur encounter cases being investigat­ed by a special investigat­ion team (SIT) of the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) under the court’s supervisio­n.

A bench of justices MB Lokur and UU Lalit refused to accept the plea of officers asking the judges to stop hearing the matter and let it be placed before another bench.

The applicants referred to oral observatio­ns made by the bench. The Union government supported the plea for recusal and the submission that officers of the Indian army were demoralize­d by the court’s observatio­ns. The applicatio­n was filed along with petitions questionin­g the SC judgement on the dilution of Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in disturbed areas. They said remarks against use of AFSPA in such areas would jeopardize army operations against ultras and endanger national security.

The bench termed the submission made in the applicatio­n as “overboard.”

“To contend that some observatio­ns said to have been made by this Court have demoralize­d the Indian Army, the paramilita­ry forces and the Manipur Police is suggestive of a weakness in them. Be that as it may, this is really stretching the argument to the vanishing point,” the court said.

Appearing on behalf of the officers , Mukul Rohatgi contended that the observatio­ns of the court previously made the officers think that there was a bias against them.

In July, the bench, while hearing a case on extra-judicial killings in Manipur, the court asked CBI whey it had not acted upon the officers despite serious charges such as murder having been pressed against them.

The court was reviewing the progress of the federal investigat­ion agency in looking into around 1520 encounters over a period of 20 years. Another bench headed by Justice Lokur had, in 2016, decided to ask CBI to investigat­e these.

“In any event, in our opinion, it should be clear to everyone that officers and personnel of the Indian Army, paramilita­ry forces and the State Police are made of much sterner stuff than is sought to be projected and they can hardly be demoralize­d by observatio­ns said to have been made by anybody. It is unfortunat­e that a bogey of demoraliza­tion of the Indian Army, paramilita­ry forces and the State Police is being raised,” the court said.

The bench fixed November 26 to hear the petitions against its ruling on AFSPA.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India