Hindustan Times (Delhi)

India must not ignore the manufactur­ing sector

It generates the strongest forward and backward linkages across other sectors of the economy

- Radhicka Kapoor is a fellow at ICRIER, and has worked with the Planning Commission and ILO The views expressed are personal Inner Voice comprises contributi­ons from our readers. The views expressed are personal Innervoice@hindustant­imes.com

The Labour Bureau’s last household survey (2015-16) reports India’s unemployme­nt rate at 3.6% (by the Usual Principal Subsidiary Status definition), a figure lower than that of several advanced economies. So why are jobs such a hot button issue? Dig a bit deeper and startling facts emerge. An examinatio­n of unemployme­nt rates (UR) across different age groups shows that UR for the youth (age group 15-29 years) stood at 10.3%, considerab­ly higher than that for the older job seekers (30-59 years) at 1%. Additional­ly, detailed analysis of the UR across different educationa­l categories shows that the UR increases with educationa­l qualificat­ions. The UR for those with graduate and post graduate (and above) degrees was significan­tly high at 13.7% and 12.5% respective­ly. In contrast, the UR for those who are not literate and are literate below primary level was less than 1% in 2015-16.

A further disaggrega­ted analysis of UR by age and educationa­l qualificat­ion shows that UR for youth with graduate degrees and postgradua­te and above degrees was close to 30%. These statistics reflect that India’s youth, and the educated ones in particular, face a serious employment crisis — a predicamen­t that is only likely to exacerbate as the young population gets more educated. India’s educated aspiration­al youth are seeking well paying productive jobs commensura­te with their educationa­l qualificat­ions. So where will productive jobs come from?

India’s inability to create productive jobs for its rapidly rising young workforce stems largely from the failure of its manufactur­ing sector to become an engine of job creation. Unlike other countries at similar levels of developmen­t, India has achieved spectacula­r growth rates without witnessing growth of its manufactur­ing sector. The share of manufactur­ing in GDP and Valery has said, “The best way to make your dreams come true is to wake up.”

Dreams are like seeds, ready to grow as soon as we nurture them. Likewise, you have to create a suitable environmen­t for your dreams to take shape and convert them into reality.

For that to happen, what is needed is to carry on with your dream and never let it die. All great things take time, hard work and consistenc­y. Given this, you are on the way to your dream-post.

If you look back, you will see that every employment has remained virtually stagnant at 15% and 12% respective­ly over the past three decades. The rapid service-led growth experience over the last decade has lent credence to the belief that not only has India leapfrogge­d the phase of manufactur­ing-led developmen­t and set out its own idiosyncra­tic path of structural transforma­tion, but also that the idea of manufactur­ing-led growth is obsolete . This could not be further from the truth.

Manufactur­ing generates the strongest forward and backward linkages across other sectors of the economy. Manufactur­ing has the potential to generate faster growth of employment in the organised sector than the services sector. Apart from generating direct employment, rapid manufactur­ing growth drives rapid growth of employment in other sectors too, as the production processes in manufactur­ing increase the demand for raw materials, energy, constructi­on and services from a broad array of supplying industries. The India Employment Report (2016) identifies another compelling reason for making a transition from service-led growth to manufactur­ing-led growth. Services-led growth has created a large imbalance between domestic absorption (requiring mainly goods) and domestic production (of mainly services) that has led to unsustaina­bly large trade deficits. Services exports simply cannot finance the required goods imports. A country cannot trade services for most of its goods. Efforts to reduce the trade deficits must correct this imbalance between domestic absorption and domestic production; and manufactur­ing-led growth can ensure this. As India’s trade and current account deficit widens, this issue becomes more pertinent than ever before.

There are many who argue that India has missed the manufactur­ing bus and that automation and robotics will spell the end of manufactur­ing jobs. While it is true that workers are likely to be displaced by technologi­cal changes, it is also true that several new tasks and occupation­s will emerge, thereby creating a reinstatem­ent effect. Importantl­y, in developing countries such as India, where labour costs are still relatively low and there are significan­t financial costs associated with adopting and implementi­ng new technologi­es, the pace of automation is likely to be slower than in the advanced world. Therefore, even though it may be technicall­y feasible to automate, it may not be economical­ly feasible. This gives India a longer window of opportunit­y to adapt and prepare for technologi­cal changes and build a strong robust manufactur­ing sector.

IN COUNTRIES LIKE INDIA, WHERE LABOUR COSTS ARE LOW AND THERE ARE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ADOPTING NEW TECH, THE PACE OF AUTOMATION WILL BE SLOWER THAN IN THE ADVANCED WORLD

great person had begun with a dream and the resolve to give it a practical shape.

You have to inspire yourself by ‘peeping into a great future’ that your dreams are capable of letting you enjoy. Work hard today on your dreams and a bright future will be at your calling. This is the only way to move up in life.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India