Hindustan Times (Delhi)

A win without Virat contributi­ng with bat is creditable

WINNING FORMULA India’s success in the Adelaide Test was a combinatio­n of Cheteshwar Pujara’s batsmanshi­p, pacers’ accuracy and Kohli’s captaincy

- The former Australian Test captain is writing exclusivel­y for Hindustan Times

anyone else’s opinion.

ISHANT OUTSTANDIN­G

The biggest revelation in India’s victory was the improved performanc­e of the fast bowlers. They pitched the ball fuller than on previous tours and were relentless­ly accurate. No bowler epitomised this more than Ishant Sharma whose consistenc­y in both those areas was a far cry from previous tours. Now he needs to attend to his no-ball problem.

The Indian pace bowlers also had great success with the shortpitch­ed delivery. On a surface that didn’t deteriorat­e much and contained very few demons even in the fourth innings, they did well to remove Peter Handscomb, Travis Head and captain Tim Paine with well directed bouncers.

A large part of that success -in the case of Handscomb and Head -- was the surprise element. It’ll be interestin­g to see the bowlers’ approach with Perth looming and the prospect of a pitch that contains both more pace and bounce than Adelaide.

BATTING WORRIES

The Perth pitch will also be a challenge for the Indian batsmen who, Pujara apart, didn’t cover themselves in glory in Adelaide. In particular both K L Rahul and Rohit Sharma did nothing to dispel the notion that they too often concede their wicket far too easily for batsmen of their talent. Pant also needs to capitalise on his talent and not continue to fall back on the excuse of “that’s the way I play”.

For their part the Australian­s will be happy with the fight they showed but disappoint­ed in the end result.

The fast bowlers will be better for the work out and will be buoyed by the prospect of a favourable surface in the next Test. The batsmen still have plenty to prove and will be chastened by the creditable way the lower order performed in the run chase.

On the score of changing the order for Perth, it would be a slight on the batsmen to do this after one Test. It would also send the signal to India that they were successful in their Adelaide approach.

Having gained the upperhand in the series, India need to be aware of what happened in 2003-04, the last time they enjoyed this sort of supremacy. They comfortabl­y lost the next Test at the MCG but the current pace attack is superior to their predecesso­rs.

Having gained the upper hand, India need to be aware of what happened in 2003-04. They comfortabl­y lost the next Test at the MCG.

On the Perth Test

 ?? AP ?? Though Ishant Sharma put up a vastly improved show in the Adelaide Test compared to previous tours, he needs to address the no-ball problem, says Chappell.
AP Though Ishant Sharma put up a vastly improved show in the Adelaide Test compared to previous tours, he needs to address the no-ball problem, says Chappell.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India