Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Fulfilling obligation­s on JEM sanctions: Pak

- Press Trust of India letters@hindustant­imes.com

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Sunday said Jaish-e-mohammad, which claimed responsibi­lity for the Pulwama terror attack, was banned in 2002 and Islamabad was fulfilling its obligation­s on sanctions as per the law.

In a major diplomatic offensive against Islamabad after the attack, India has highlighte­d Pakistan’s role in using terrorism as an instrument of state policy.

India has slammed Pakistan for stating that it had no role in the Pulwama attack carried out by Pakistan-based terror group JEM, saying Islamabad could not claim that it was unaware of the presence of terror groups on its soil as the links of such outfits to the country were there for everyone to see.

Ministry of external affairs spokespers­on Raveesh Kumar said: “JEM has claimed responsibi­lity for the attack. The organisati­on and its leadership are located in Pakistan.” Pakistani ministers had shared the same podium with Un-proscribed terrorists, Kumar said.

Kumar said India demanded that Pakistan should take immediate and verifiable action against terrorists and terror groups operating from territorie­s under its control to create a conducive atmosphere in the region, free of terror. However, Pakistan foreign office spokespers­on Mohammad Faisal rejected India’s allegation, saying, “JEM remains a proscribed entity in Pakistan since 2002 and Pakistan is implementi­ng its obligation­s on sanctions implementa­tion.”

Claiming that India’s allegation­s were made within a short time from the attack and without carrying out any investigat­ions, Faisal said, “These knee-jerk and pre-conceived accusation­s were neverthele­ss consistent with well-rehearsed tactics from Indian playbook after such incidents in the past.”

Referring to India’s assertions that “JEM claims of responsibi­lity” for the attacker and the purported “video of the attacker”, he questioned the “selective” and “self-serving” standards that India adhered to in this respect.

Faisal said while India accepted the unverified social media content as “gold stan- dard”, it was not ready to accept the “confession­s” by its national Kulbhushan Jadhav for perpetrati­ng violence in Pakistan.

He said India needed to introspect and respond to questions about its security and intelligen­ce lapses that led to this attack. India owes an explanatio­n on reports of Adil Ahmed Dar’s arrest and custody since 2017.

Pakistan desired normalisat­ion of relations with India and in his letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Prime Minister Imran Khan followed his intention of taking two steps if India takes one, with the proposal for both Foreign Ministers to meet on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Faisal said, adding, “It was India which cancelled the meeting on baseless pretexts.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India