Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Some parties open to compromise solution

-

Hindu side by at least three parties — Nirvani Akhara, the parent body of the Nirmohi Akhara, and the Ram Janmabhoom­i Punrudhar Committee represente­d by Swami Avimuktesh­waranand.

To be sure, two of the main parties from the Hindu side, the infant deity Ram Lalla and the Ram Janmabhoom­i Nyas, have not signed the settlement. Nor has the Jamiat Ulema-e-hind from the Muslim side. In other words, most of the hardline groups on either side of the case are not on board with the settlement plan submitted by the mediators.

The settlement also asked for a national institutio­n for harmony between communitie­s to be set up in Ayodhya.

In September 2010, the Allahabad high court ordered trifurcati­on of the disputed land among the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and representa­tives of Ram Lalla. Fourteen appeals were filed in the top court against the high court verdict.

The Supreme Court in March 2019 referred the matter to the three-member mediation panel. The proceeding­s did not result in any settlement, the mediation panel said in August. But the efforts were revived in September, and the mediation panel submitted its final report to the top court on October 16 (Wednesday), the last day of hearing.

“In no way can it said that the Sunni Waqf Board has withdrawn its claim from the petition. The trial has been completed and the judgment is reserved. But in a case as important and complicate­d as this, the road map could prove to be an important tool towards reaching a verdict that resolves the issue,” said a person familiar with the developmen­ts who asked not to be named.

Media reports early on Thursday suggested that the Sunni Central Waqf Board had in a dramatic twist withdrawn its petition in the matter. To this, Sunni Waqf Board advocate Zafaryab Jilani clarified: “Any applicatio­n of withdrawal will be given in court. No applicatio­n has been filed.”

MR Shamshad, the advocate for Iqbal Ansari, one of the individual parties to the case, said such an agreement will have no bearing on the matter. “Even if the board [Sunni Sunni Central Waqf Board] has agreed to something, it is of no consequenc­e. This case is being contested by six other [individual Muslim] parties... Sunni Board is one party, and it has no more locus than any other individual Muslim party.”

A verdict is expected by November 17, which is when Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, who heads the Constituti­on bench, retires.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India