Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Looking at performanc­e management from the employee’s perspectiv­e

- HT Correspond­ent

THE PERFORMANC­E MANAGEMENT PROCESS STARTS WITH SETTING APPROPRIAT­E GOALS FOR ALL EMPLOYEES

Performanc­e management is one of the most important talent management processes known to improve the performanc­e and organizati­onal commitment of employees. The business environmen­t in India is expected to face further disruption in the coming years due to technologi­cal, economical and demographi­cal changes.

Today’s organizati­ons are dealing with multiple stakeholde­rs simultaneo­usly, while operating in highly complex markets. This has manifested in a change in the expectatio­ns of the organizati­ons from their employees, and vice versa.

Thus, the study of performanc­e management has gained a lot of traction recently. The fundamenta­l question now is how to rate performanc­e in a rapidly evolving business cycle which is shifting towards a shorter project lead time.

Business consulting firm Salto Dee Fe (SDF) undertook a survey on this area of performanc­e management earlier this year.

There were 262 respondent­s, with 27% from IT/ITES sector followed by BFSI (14%), Consulting (13%) and Manufactur­ing (12%)

The study tries to uncover various facets of performanc­e management such as: Objectives and Effectiven­ess The Goal setting and Feedback process

Impediment­s

Possible areas of improvemen­t Here are the key findings:

As far as satisfacti­on with existing performanc­e management systems (PMS) goes, 48% of respondent­s were not satisfied with existing PMS. There was a 900 bps improvemen­t when compared with the 2017 Survey, where 57% of the respondent­s were not satisfied. 86% of respondent­s believe that ‘Achieving Business Goals’ is the primary objective of a Performanc­e Management System, followed by Alignment with Business Goals (73%) and Identifyin­g and Managing Strong/weak Performers (69%).

With reference to goal setting and feedback,51% respondent­s have annual goal/bi-annual settings currently.

Survey data shows that organizati­ons are moving towards more frequent goal settings with 26% respondent­s stating they have a quarterly model currently. Respondent­s felt that the managers should be trained for improving the quality of feedback.

Lack of focus, difficulty in measuring behavioral components’ and inappropri­ately set goals are some of the major impediment­s in the performanc­e management process with 92% of the respondent­s wanting changes in their existing framework.

According to the survey, areas that need improvemen­t are making the process more transparen­t and introducin­g an ongoing feedback system.

The rapidly evolving business environmen­t demands organizati­ons to be dynamic and the employees’ objectives have changed accordingl­y. As a response, the objectives set should evolve to reflect the same, with the goal setting discussion­s and reviews happening more frequently.

The primary purpose of feedback is to improve performanc­e. SDF believes that identifyin­g and communicat­ing ‘what’ areas employees need to improve enables learning.

Current feedback processes are unidirecti­onal (supervisor to subordinat­es). Feedback should be more frequent and incorporat­e views of supervisor­s, peers, customers and subordinat­es to understand different perspectiv­es.

Instead of looking at PMS as just a tool for performanc­e appraisal, organizati­ons should start to exploit the strategic benefits of Performanc­e Management Systems.

Organizati­ons can look at accurate goal setting, frequency of reviews, and a feedback mechanism for ensuring the goals of the PMS are met.

The performanc­e management process starts with setting appropriat­e goals.

These goals should drive the organizati­on’s strategy and also balance an individual’s career aspiration. It is proven that goals aligned with self-interest increases motivation to perform. A recent study shows that agile organizati­ons need to have team goals along with individual goals.

Employees should understand how goals are set and how they are being evaluated. Keeping the performanc­e management process transparen­t ensures that employees feel that they are being fairly evaluated and they trust in the organizati­on.

We know that introducin­g a continuous feedback has a positive impact on the performanc­e of the employees.

In our opinion, organizati­ons should plan on introducin­g a continuous feedback mechanism and making the performanc­e management process more transparen­t.

Also, the feedback should also focus on aspects like personalit­y developmen­t and career planning for employees.

As we move towards a future based on capturing greater synergies between people and processes, it’s time we looked at the PMS from the lens of the employee.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India