Hindustan Times (Delhi)

SC rejects pleas against K’taka govt law on quota to SCS, STS

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

nNEWDELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a bunch of pleas seeking exclusion of creamy layer or better-off individual­s among Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) communitie­s at the entry-level when it comes to the reservatio­n in promotions.

It observed the pleas were an attempt by the petitioner­s to challenge the actions of the Karnataka government taken pursuant to a law, which was already held to be valid by the top court in 2019.

“The present MAS [miscellane­ous applicatio­ns] though styled as applicatio­ns for directions, seek to lay challenge to the actions of the State government to carry into effect the provisions of the Reservatio­n Act 2018,” a bench of justices UU Lalit and DY Chandrachu­d observed.

The applicatio­ns were filed in the BK Pavitra case in which the top court had, in 2019, upheld the constituti­onal validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequent­ial Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservatio­ns (to the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act.

If the petitioner­s are aggrieved by the steps taken by the state government, it is open to them to pursue a substantiv­e remedy for challengin­g the steps taken by the state government in independen­t proceeding­s, the court said dismissing the applicatio­ns.

The Act enacted by the Karnataka government provides, among other things, for consequent­ial seniority to persons belonging to SC and ST categories promoted under the reservatio­n policy of Karnataka.

Consequent­ial seniority enables reserved category candidates to retain their seniority for subsequent promotions. That is, if an SC/ST candidate is promoted ahead of a general category candidate by reason of reservatio­n in promotion, then the promoted SC/ST candidate will retain that seniority for subsequent promotions and will thus be considered senior to general category candidate who was promoted later.

The Supreme Court in its 2019 judgment had held that the Act was a valid exercise of power by the government under Article 16 (4A) which empowers the state to provide reservatio­ns to SC/STS in matters of promotion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India