Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Cong objects as Twitter locks accounts of party, key leaders

- Deeksha Bhardwaj letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Nearly 5,000 Twitter accounts, including those of several senior Congress leaders and the party’s official handle, were temporaril­y locked on Thursday after they shared a photograph of Rahul Gandhi meeting a minor rape victim’s family — his account was already locked on Saturday — even as the party mounted an attack on the Union government for scuttling free speech. The microblogg­ing platform, however, maintains it “impartiall­y” enforces its rules and terms of service.

Accounts of senior leaders such as Randeep Singh Surjewala, Ajay Maken, Sushmita Dev and Manickam Tagore were temporaril­y locked, Congress functionar­ies familiar with the matter said. The party’s official handle was also barred from posting, they added.

The party’s social media head Rohan Gupta said, “Twitter is acting under govt pressure. It has already blocked 5,000 accounts of our leaders and workers across India”. “They need to understand we can’t be pressurise­d by Twitter or government,” he added.

Gupta said he has started the campaign “I too am Rahul” in light of Twitter’s action to temporaril­y lock the former Congress chief’s account, which he claimed was singling out Gandhi. “If a government body can post a similar picture without being actioned, then why is Rahul Gandhi being singled out?” His reference was to a post by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes wherein a similar photograph of the family was shared.

The tweet in question has been withheld from public view.

Twitter said it enforces its rules judiciousl­y and impartiall­y. “Twitter rules are enforced judiciousl­y and impartiall­y for everyone on our service. We have taken proactive action on several hundred Tweets that posted an image that violated our Rules, and may continue to do so in line with our range of enforcemen­t options,” a Twitter spokespers­on said. “Certain types of private informatio­n carry higher risks than others, and our aim is always to protect individual­s’ privacy and safety. We strongly encourage everyone on the service to familiaris­e themselves with the Twitter Rules and report anything they believe is in violation.”

Twitter admitted that it was alerted by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) about the tweet which revealed the victim’s identity. It added that it reviewed the tweet against Twitter rules and policies, as well as the concerns expressed as a matter of the Indian law.

The NCPCR has moved the Delhi high court over the issue.

The incident came to light on Saturday after the opposition party tweeted that the former Congress party chief had been barred from posting from his account.

The Congress first said Gandhi’s account was suspended. “Shri @Rahulgandh­i’s Twitter account has been temporaril­y suspended & due process is being followed for and posted the photo of his meeting with the girl’s relatives.

Twitter has taken down the post. “When we determine that a Tweet violated the Twitter Rules, we require the violator to remove it before they can Tweet again. We send an email notificati­on to the violator identifyin­g the Tweet(s) in violation and which policies have been violated. They will then need to go through the process of removing the violating Tweet or appealing our review if they believe we made an error,” the enforcemen­t page states.

Experts on the subject are split, with some arguing that Gandhi’s tweet is in violation of Indian law and Twitter’s actions are justified. Kazim Rizvi, founder of the policy think tank The Dialogue, said that Gandhi’s tweet violates Section 23 (2) of POCSO Act and Section 74 of Juvenile Justice Act, which outlaws the disclosure of any sensitive informatio­n about child victim of rape. “This law has been reinforced by Justice Deepak Gupta of the Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena vs Union of India wherein the court provided exhaustive guidleines to prohibit disclosure of personal informatio­n regarding a rape victim including those who are deceased in order to protect their dignity,” he said.

“Posting pictures with the family of a rape victim poses concerns regarding the safety and security of the family. This is violative of both the terms of service of platforms and also the global best practices on Platform Regulation. Towards this, the action by Twitter is in accordance with the Indian laws and its own Rules.”

Rizvi said the accounts have only been temporaril­y locked, not suspended, as per Twitter’s rules.

Supreme Court lawyer Sourav Roy said one has to take cognizance of the context of the tweet. “This is minor Dalit girl and the police were harassing victim’s family. If Gandhi’s visit aimed to highlight the plight of the victim then there is no hard and fast rule that he should not be allowed to post such a photograph...”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India