Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Will not interfere with single-judge order: High court

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

The Delhi high court on Monday refused to interfere with a single-judge order declining to remove the alleged defamatory statements and posts shared by BJP MLA Vijender Gupta against Delhi transport minister Kailash Gahlot over alleged irregulari­ties in the procuremen­t of 1,000 low-floor buses.

“We do not want to pass an order because this may have some repercussi­on on one or the other party,” a bench of justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh said. “In politics... I mean… you don’t have to be so sensitive about this,” the court remarked.

Gupta’s counsel verbally assured the court that till the next date of hearing on September 20, before the single judge, his client will not make any press statements or tweets on the issue. The bench, taking note of this, ordered that on the next date of hearing, none of the parties would seek adjournmen­t and requested the judge to proceed with the matter.

The court’s order came on an appeal filed by Gahlot against the single judge’s August 27 order refusing to pass an ex parte order in the civil defamation suit against the BJP MLA. The court, while issuing summons to Gupta, also gave him 30 days to respond to the suit saying that prima facie no personal allegation­s

NEW DELHI:

were made against Gahlot.

On Monday, senior advocate Rajiv Nayar, representi­ng Gahlot, argued that the approach of single judge was erroneous and that the personal allegation­s were made against the AAP leader by Gupta. He said an Lg-appointed committee has already given the government a clean chit in the matter.

Nayar argued that even after filing a civil and a criminal defamation plea, Gupta released a press note stating that the high court has “rejected” all the contention­s and arguments of the Delhi minister.

When the court asked Gupta’s counsel Ranjit Kumar about it, he replied that it was Gupta’s understand­ing of the order and maybe wrongly worded.

Taking note of Gupta’s lawyer’s submission, the high court disposed of Gahlot’s appeal.

In the civil defamation suit, Gahlot has sought ₹5 crore damages from Gupta for allegedly making scandalous statements relating to irregulari­ties in the procuremen­t of low floor buses.

HT reported on July 11 that the L-g-appointed panel gave a clean chit to the Delhi Transport Corporatio­n (DTC) in the tendering and procuremen­t of the buses, although it found some “procedural lapses” arising out of “a bona fide decision making”.

Last month, the Union government recommende­d a CBI probe in the matter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India