Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Action for Prophet comments well-considered decision: BJP

-

Smriti Kak Ramachandr­an

NEW DELHI: A day after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) suspended one spokespers­on, Nupur Sharma, and expelled another, Naveen Jindal, for making derogatory comments against Prophet Mohammed and his wife, functionar­ies said the action was a “well-considered decision”, and not precipitat­ed by the uproar in West Asian countries.

“The party had taken cognisance of the comments and after following the due process, a decision was taken to relieve the two spokespers­ons of their duties. Subsequent­ly, a statement was also issued that reiterated the party’s stand that we do not condone insults to any religion,” a senior functionar­y said, seeking anonymity.

The now-suspended spokespers­on made the comments targeting the Prophet during a television debate on May 26 and a first informatio­n report against her was filed on May 28 in Mumbai. Jindal tweeted objectiona­ble comments on June 1.

HT learns that envoys of several West Asian countries started flagging these as potentiall­y problemati­c soon after. However, it was only over the weekend, when Twitter exploded with outrage in many West Asian countries that the government was pushed to act.

The delay in announcing the action was on account of senior leaders being preoccupie­d with outreach programmes planned to mark the eight years of the National Democratic Alliance government in power at the Centre, the functionar­y claimed.

A second leader added that the public outrage, posts on social media, and countries conveying their displeasur­e to Indian diplomats through backchanne­ls convinced the party to take immediate action. “There was consensus among the top leadership about the decision to take action. It was left to the disciplina­ry committee to examine the statements and convey the final decision.”

On Sunday, a clutch of countries including Egypt, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia conveyed their consternat­ion over the remarks by Sharma and Jindal, which snowballed into a diplomatic kerfuffle.

The action has also focused attention on the narrative building and public posturing by party leaders on contentiou­s issues.

“Functionar­ies are told to stick to the party line and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s developmen­t agenda. Anyone deviating from the agenda will have to face the consequenc­es,” said a third party leader.

Periodic training workshops by senior BJP leaders are conducted for all spokespers­ons to familiaris­e them with the party’s line and ensure there is no disparity in the response to issues.

“There is a need for restating over and over again that party spokespers­ons need to be discreet and careful on certain issues, especially if they are sensitive topics like religion. They should be able to use their judgment and decide where to step back and not comment, as all issues do not merit a response,” the second functionar­y said.

While most leaders, including some of the spokespeop­le, on Monday showed deference to the action taken, the use of the term “fringe” for party spokespers­ons by foreign ministry officials has not gone down well with a section of BJP leaders.“we are the party’s foot soldiers and will follow the instructio­ns, but there is a sense of unease because Sharma was responding to comments that were derogatory to Hindu gods,” said a spokespers­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India