Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

AAP must go back to its roots

To rediscover itself, Kejriwal’s party must once again become the voice of the powerless Indian

- RAJDEEP SARDESAI

On the day the exit polls for the Delhi municipal elections were predicting a BJP landslide, AAP spokespers­ons were in a defiant mood, blaming the EVMs for a looming defeat. But how can you blame an exit poll for potential tampering of an EVM since the pollster is sampling voters, not the machine, I asked? The AAP representa­tive paused and then blurted out: “Sab mile hue hai’. Conspiracy theories abound in India but by blaming EVMs for their debacle, AAP runs the risk of deepening its credibilit­y crisis.

Truth is, rather than throw up unproven EVM conspiracy theories, the AAP leadership needs a reality check: Why is the middle class feeling let down by a party it supported so overwhelmi­ngly just two years ago? If even the extravagan­t promise of waiving house tax didn’t cut ice with the voter in middle-income colonies, then it clearly suggests a widening trust deficit. It was the middle class, after all, that had embraced AAP in its original avatar as an offshoot of the Lokpal movement, as an idealistic force driven by moral power.

When Arvind Kejriwal was given a second chance by the Delhi electorate in 2015 it was premised on the hope that he would provide an alternativ­e political culture to the ‘corrupted’ national parties. ‘Hope’ is an idea that stitches together dreams: For the salaried middle class, ‘hope’ makes life worth living. When hope is killed, it translates, first into disappoint­ment, and then anger.

Instead of providing wholesome governance, AAP saw its USP in confrontin­g the Narendra Modi government and Modi in particular, a kind of David versus Goliath battle, which AAP as the quintessen­tial ‘outsider’ revelled in. While the Centre has been often unjustly hostile to AAP’s emergence, when a combative attitude becomes an end in itself, it only breeds negativism. You can be anti-establishm­ent as an opposition­al, activist force challengin­g the status quo; you can’t survive on accusatory politics once in government.

While efforts like mohalla clinics and school education reforms were welcome steps, the good work being done was overshadow­ed by the noise created over Kejriwal’s repeated run-ins with the L-G, the Centre, and former colleagues Yogendra Yadav and Prashant Bhushan. The optics were clearly wrong: Far from building a bottom-up political structure based on a spirit of voluntaris­m, Kejriwal was perceived as being his own high command: A small coterie seemed to replace the thousands of volunteers who had helped create the AAP phenomenon in the first place.

The raw courage Kejriwal had shown in taking on traditiona­l elites was now seen as self-righteous conceit and the same media which had once glorified him was now looking to pull him down.

The scale of AAP’s 2015 victory along with the failure of the Opposition to throw up a strong alternativ­e to Modi, convinced Kejriwal that he could fill the national leadership vacuum. In the process, he made the mistake of many an ambitious start-up: Attempting to expand without consolidat­ing. The move into Punjab and Goa sent out the message that AAP was taking Delhi for granted. By contrast, the BJP sensed the voter mood astutely.

Corruption has been endemic to civic bodies with many councillor­s becoming crorepatis overnight: For 10 years, the BJP was seen to have presided over an ineffectua­l and corrupt local body. But by denying tickets to all its sitting councillor­s and revolving the campaign around Brand Modi, the BJP changed the narrative. The promise of a ‘new BJP’ was seductive to urban voters still mesmerised by the Modi charisma. The same middle class that cheered Kejriwal when he exposed the Congress appeared reluctant to endorse him when he challenged Modi, a leader who has cleverly appropriat­ed the pro-poor, anti-corruption plank post-demonetisa­tion.

Ironically, it is the BJP’s obsessive Modicentri­c approach that provides parties like AAP an opportunit­y for course correction.

The opportunit­y lies in raising citizen’s issues even where the electoral benefit may not be immediatel­y apparent but where a sense of people connect is restored. The next time there is a dengue or chikunguny­a outbreak, AAP must offer an imaginativ­e alternativ­e solution rather than cruelly blame ‘divine interventi­on’ and the BJP for the mosquito menace. Why not spearhead a volunteer-driven mass awareness campaign on the state of public health and sanitation in Delhi? To rediscover itself, AAP must go back to its original identity built during the anti-corruption Anna agitation: A public spirited movement that becomes the voice of those who feel desperatel­y powerless in the India of today.

Rajdeep Sardesai is a senior journalist and an author The views expressed are personal

 ?? Illustrati­on: SIDDHANT JUMDE ??
Illustrati­on: SIDDHANT JUMDE
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India