Interpol won’t issue Red Corner Notice against Naik
MUMBAI/NEWDELHI: In a setback to Indian agencies, the Interpol has refused to issue a Red Corner Notice (RCN) against controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, citing lack of formal charge sheet against the Mumbai-based televangelist when the request was submitted. The agency has also instructed all related bureaus and member countries to delete the data file of Naik from its records. HT is in possession of Interpol letter, dated December 11, 2017, which could prove to be a major roadblock for India’s attempt to extradite Naik.
Naik fled India after he was accused of influencing terrorists involved in terror strike in Dhaka on July 1, 2016. According to reports, Naik took refuge in Malaysia after obtaining permanent residency there.
The 51-year-old televangelist, through a video message, said, “I am relieved after the order of the Interpol for cancellation of the notice. However, I would be much more relieved if my own government and Indian agencies give me justice and clear me of all charges.” He further went on to say that “truth has a fantastic way of coming out. It came out internationally and it would be out soon in India too”. The decision to not issue an RCN against Naik was taken by the Interpol’s Commission in its 102nd session held on 24-27 October 2017.
He has been accused of spreading hatred through his provocative speeches, funding terrorists and laundering several crores of rupees over the years. Following the charges, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in November last year registered a criminal case against him. His Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) has also been proscribed. The Indian authorities had approached the Interpol for a RCN against Naik, but he had challenged it, contending that the process of law was not followed. Naik contended that there was a severe lack of evidentiary basis, a failure by Indian authorities to follow due process of law, political and religious bias that formed the basis of such a notice, and lack of international interest.
Indian authorities, however, contested Naik’s claim and submitted that Naik’s organisation IRF had been declared as unlawful and during investigation enough evidence had been gathered against Naik. The agency, however, admitted that no charge sheet was filed at the time of submitting the request.