Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

PNB probe widens, CBI books Gitanjali Group

MEA ACTION Passports of Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi suspended for four weeks

- Shaswati Das and Remya Nair letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: The Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party traded charges over the fraud at the state-owned Punjab National Bank involving jeweller Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi on a day when the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion registered fresh complaints against the latter and his Gitanjali Group.

Meanwhile, the ministry of external affairs suspended the passports of the duo for four weeks, the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e seized ₹549 crore worth of precious stones and gold from the premises of the two, and the income-tax department attached 29 properties and 105 accounts of Modi, his wife, and their firms.

The Congress claimed the actual size of the fraud at the bank was ₹21,306 crore and stepped up heat on the Prime Minister and his government for the escape of Modi who left India on January 1.

Union human resources developmen­t minister Prakash Javadekar retorted that the fraud was perpetrate­d in 2011, when the Congress-led UPA was in power.

Matters took an interestin­g turn with Dinesh Dubey, a former independen­t director of Allahabad Bank claiming to news agency ANI that in 2013 he had sent a dissent note to the UPA government and the Reserve Bank of India against a decision to provide a loan to Choksi’s Gitanjali Gems.

He added that he resigned after he was pressured to sign off on the loan. Former banking secretary Rajiv Takru said he had no knowledge of this and had met Dubey only once, when the latter visited him to hand over his resignatio­n.

The CBI’s complaints against Choksi and his company Gitanjali Gems were in relation to a ₹4,887 crore fraud which is part of the larger ₹11,400 crore fraud perpetrate­d on PNB. A Gitanjali Gems spokespers­on declined comment.

A CBI officer who asked not to be named said the fresh complaint concerned “143 letters of undertakin­g (LoUs) and 224 foreign letters of credit (LoCs)”. He added that CBI officers found a server in one of Gitanjali’s premises that could have data pertinent to the fraud.

According to CBI, Choksi and his companies used these LoUs, which were unauthoriz­ed by the bank, and issued by corrupt officials, to raise buyer’s credit overseas – the same charges levelled against Modi’s companies. This money was supposed to be used to buy pearls and diamonds, but wasn’t. The banks that loaned money to Choksi and Modi – on the basis of PNB’s guarantees – now want the lender to pay up. According to PNB , the fraud dates back to 2011.

PNB moved to declare Gitanjali Gems a fraud company, which means other banks with exposure to the company will now have to do the same.

On Friday, CBI started questionin­g four PNB officials named in its earlier complaint, Sanjay Kumar Prasad, Bechu Tiwari, MK Sharma, and Manoj Kharat. PNB also suspended eight more officers including one at the general manager level, PTI reported.

That takes the total number of officers suspended by the bank since Wednesday when it first declared the Rs 11,400 crore fraud, to 18.

The Reserve Bank of India said it has undertaken an assessment of PNB’s control systems but denied news reports that it had directed the lender to meet its commitment­s to other banks.

MUMBAI: Punjab National Bank (PNB) has declared Gitanjali Group a fraud entity after it discovered that group companies, along with firms helmed by jeweller Nirav Modi, were involved in fraudulent transactio­ns worth Rs11,4000 crore through letters of undertakin­g issued by the bank, said five people aware of the matter.

According to the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) regulation­s, a company is declared a fraud based on provisions of the Indian Penal Code, which entails, among other things, misappropr­iation, criminal breach of trust, and irregulari­ties in foreign exchange transactio­ns. Once a company is declared a fraud by a bank, other lenders will have to follow suit. The regulation­s mandate that where accounts are classified as fraud, banks are required to make provisions to the full extent immediatel­y, irrespecti­ve of the value of security or collateral.

At the end of September, Gitanjali had a net debt of Rs6,874.97 crore. Its lenders include ICICI Bank and IDBI Bank, according to informatio­n in its 2016-17 annual report. RBI regulation­s state that if a bank is unable to make the entire provisions, then it can do so over four quarters. The consortium of lenders to Gitanjali met on Thursday to take stock of the situation.

Gitanjali Group said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that it had not had any “unauthoris­ed” dealings with PNB or its officials. “All allegation­s being directed at us seem premature considerin­g the matter is still under investigat­ion,” the note said.

In a late-night stock exchange notificati­on on Wednesday, PNB said it submitted a fraud report on 7 February to RBI after confirming the liability of Gitanjali Group companies. It also said that it had filed a criminal complaint for registerin­g a first informatio­n report (FIR) against the accused for the offences of cheating and fraud.

 ?? ANSHUMAN POYREKAR/HT ?? A Nirav Modi outlet at Kalaghoda in Mumbai.
ANSHUMAN POYREKAR/HT A Nirav Modi outlet at Kalaghoda in Mumbai.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India