Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

Hrera has jurisdicti­on over unregister­ed realty project with completion certificat­e

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

PANCHKULA: Bringing unregister­ed projects with completion certificat­e under the purview of the state real estate regulatory authority (Rera), the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Hrera-Panchkula) in a landmark order has held that the state authority has jurisdicti­on to adjudicate upon the complaint filed against the promoter regarding the non-performanc­e of his obligation­s even when he has got completion certificat­e and is unregister­ed with it.

The order came in the case, Sanju Jain (complainan­t) versus TDI Infrastruc­ture Ltd (promoter), wherein the authority also held that no promoter can save himself from dischargin­g his obligation­s on the ground that he has obtained a completion/occupancy certificat­e in respect of his project.

The complainan­t had approached the authority alleging non-performanc­e of obligation­s cast upon the promoter under the sale agreement.

The promoter responding to the complaint contended that the project in question already obtained a partial completion certificat­e.

Therefore, the said project does not require registrati­on under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Developmen­t and Regulation) Act and, thus, the state Rera had no jurisdicti­on to adjudicate complaint relating to such a project.

Dismissing promoter contention, the authority observed that Section 11 of the Act defines and elaborates the functions and duties of a promoter.

“Nowhere in this section is used the expression ‘promoter of a registered project’ and since the expression used everywhere in the Section is ‘Promoter’, it cannot be legitimate­ly argued that the duties cast upon the promoter will be applicable only to the promoter of a registered project and not to the promoter of an unregister­ed project,” held the authority.

Simultaneo­usly, section 34 (f) of the Act enjoins a duty upon the state Rera to ensure compliance of all the obligation­s by the stakeholde­rs in thereunder.

“There is no provision in the Act which expressly or impliedly provides that duties, responsibi­lities and obligation­s of a promoter towards his allottees will cease to exists upon grant of completion certificat­e or that the authority after grant of completion certificat­e will have no jurisdicti­on to adjudicate the complaints of the allottees,” stated the authority in the order.

HRERA (PANCHKULA) SAYS ALLOTTEES CAN APPROACH STATE RERA AGAINST UNREGISTER­ED PROMOTER FOR REDRESSAL OF THEIR GRIEVANCES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India