SC asks Centre how long will curbs continue in Kashmir
NEWDELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre as to how long the restrictions in Jammu and Kashmir, which were imposed on August 5 following the revocation of Article 370 that granted special status to J&K, would remain in place.
It also told the solicitor general that the curbs on movement and communication network that were imposed in national interest should also be reviewed. “It’s already two months. How long the restrictions will be in place?”, a three-judge bench led by Justice N V Ramana asked solicitor general Tushar Mehta who said the 99% of the area in the Valley faced no restrictions.
“You have to come with clear answers. There are other ways also [to maintain law and order],” Justice Ramana said.
The top court is hearing a batch of petitions, including the one filed by Kashmir Times executive editor, Anuradha Bhasin, challenging the communication blockade imposed in the Kashmir Valley in the wake of the August 5 decision to revoke the special status extended to J&K under Article 370 and reorganizing the state into two union territories – J&K and Ladhak. The bench fixed November 5 to hear the cases.
Justice Subhash Reddy told Mehta: “It’s fine to have restrictions in the name of national interest. But it should be reviewed regularl.” The solicitor general assured that a review will be done on a daily basis.
Appearing for Bhasin, advocate Vrinda Grover said the internet was totally shut down. Mehta took objection to this statement and reiterated that when terrorist Burhan Wani was killed by security forces in July 2016, there was an internet shut down for three months, and wondered why no one had rushed to the court then. “This has trans-border implications,” he said. The court said it would hear other petitions including the habeas corpus plea (literally means, produce the body) by CPI (Marxist) general secretary Sitaram Yechury challenging the detention of party colleague Mohd Yusuf Tarigami, on November 5.
The Jammu and Kashmir government too said the situation in the state had improved substantially.
›
You have to come with clear answers. There are other ways also [to maintain law and order]. JUSTICE N V RAMANA, SC bench