Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

CENTRE SEEKS TO BE PARTY IN CHAKRABORT­Y’S SC PLEA

- Abraham Thomas letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEWDELHI: The Centre approached the Supreme Court on Friday, seeking to be a party in a petition by actor Rhea Chakrabort­y who has appealed that an FIR filed against her over Bollywood star Sushant Singh Rajput’s death be transferre­d from Patna to Mumbai.

The department of personnel and training (DoPT) plea in the Supreme Court said the Union of India is a “necessary and proper” party to the proceeding­s. The move came in the wake of Chakrabort­y’s legal team raising objections to the Centre’s interventi­on. Maharashtr­a, Bihar, and KK Singh — Rajput’s father — are parties in her petition in the top court.

NEW DELHI: The Union government approached the Supreme Court on Friday, seeking to be a party in a petition by actor Rhea Ch a kr ab or ty who has appealed that a first informatio­n report (FIR) filed against her over Bollywood star Sushant Singh Rajput’s death be transferre­d from Patna to Mumbai.

The FIR, which is based on a complaint by Rajput’s father and accuses Chakrabort­y of abetting her 34-year-old boyfriend’s suicide, is now probed by the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion( C BI ). The Centre allowed the agency to take up the case on the basis of a request by Bihar, Rajput’s home state.

The department of personnel and training (DoPT) plea in the Supreme Court said the Union of India is a “necessary and proper” party to the proceeding­s. The move came in the wake of Chakrabort­y’s legal team raising objections to the Centre’s interventi­on. Maharashtr­a, Bihar, and KK Singh — Rajput’s father — are parties in her petition in the top court.

The Do PT filed it simple adment plea through under secretary Satya Prakash Ram Tripathi. “The present impleadmen­t applicatio­n has been necessitat­ed by virtue of the events that have taken place after filing of the present transfer petition,” it said.

At the heart of the case is a question of who the case originally belongs to — Mumbai or Bihar. Chakrabort­y’s legal team says the Bihar government cannot recommend a CBI probe since the police from that stated o not have anyjur Mumbai isdiction to even investigat­e the case. The Mumbai Police, too, have claimed that it had exclusive right to probe the case since the incident occurred under its jurisdicti­on.

Rajput, who had a short but promising career, was found hanging a this Band ra residence in suburban Mumbai on June 14.

On Friday, Bi h ar filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court, stressing that Section 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure( Cr PC) allows an offence to be “tried either at the place where the offence has been committed or where the consequenc­e ensues”. In this case, the consequenc­e of the unnatural death was in Patna, where the late actor’s family resides, it argued.

The Bihar government also sought the dismissal of Chakrabort­y’s transfer plea, and termed it “premature, misconceiv­ed and non-maintainab­le”. The affidavit, filed through advocate Keshav Mo han, said the Bi h ar Police have the jurisdicti­on in the case and accused Mumbai Police of non-cooperatio­n. It said the Mumbai Police are“apparently siding with the petitioner (Chakrabort­y) for the reasons best known to them”.

Hearing Chakrabort­y’s plea on Wednesday, the court asked Bihar, Maharashtr­a and Rajput’s father to reply to her plea within three days, and asked about the status of investigat­ion by the Police. The Mumbai Police have found the cause of Raj pu t’ s death as“asphyxia due to hanging ”, filed an accidental death report( A DR) and began an investigat­ion. While Bi ha rfil edits affidavit on Friday, Maharashtr­a and Singh are yet to file their replies. The hearing is expected to resume next week.

“The possibilit­y of the Rhea Chakrabort­y case being argued out on the next date in the Supreme Court can only be possible if Maharashtr­a government defends its jurisdicti­on. The CBI cannot operate without express consent of Maharashtr­a. I also see the possibilit­y of Mumbai Police completing its probe and putting it before the court on the next date and saying ‘we have nothing more to investigat­e’. Only a thin chance remains that Maharashtr­a will accept the situation as fait accompli and concede ground to CBI, which I doubt will happen ,” senior advocate Sanjay Hegde told HT.

Meanwhile, another petition before the Supreme Court on Friday said the entire case has not yet gone to CBI as the agency is only examining the FIR filed by Bihar Police on July 25.

The petition by law student Dwivendra Dubey failed to impress a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde. “You are a total stranger who is unnecessar­ily interferin­g in the case. The victim’s father is pursuing the case,” the bench said through videoconfe­rencing, whiled is missing the petition.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared in the matter to inform that CBI has taken over the probe from Patna Police.

THE MOVE CAME AFTER RHEA CHAKRABORT­Y’S LEGAL TEAM OBJECTED TO THE INTERVENTI­ON OF CENTRAL GOVT IN SUSHANT DEATH CASE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India