Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

CENTRE WARNS TWITTER OF ACTION, ASKS WHY IT RESTORED ACCOUNTS

- Deeksha Bhardwaj letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: The ministry of electronic­s and informatio­n technology (MeitY) has served notice on Twitter Inc to again block over 250 accounts and posts to which the micro-blogging site restored access after closing them briefly for using a false and controvers­ial hashtag in connection with the ongoing farmers’ protest on the Capital’s borders, officials said.

The notice states that Twitter, by unblocking the accounts and posts, was in violation of Section 69 (A) of the Informatio­n Technology Act that can result in a seven years’ imprisonme­nt, officials familiar with the developmen­t said on condition of anonymity. The notice, the officials said, was sent on Tuesday evening.

Twitter had on Monday blocked access in India to accounts associated with the farmers’ protest on the government’s demand.

NEW DELHI: The ministry of electronic­s and informatio­n technology (MeitY) has served notice on Twitter Inc. to again block over 250 accounts and posts to which the microblogg­ing site restored access after blocking them briefly for using a false and controvers­ial hashtag in connection with the ongoing farmers’ protest on the capital’s borders, officials said.

The notice states that Twitter, by unblocking the accounts and posts, was in violation of Section 69 (A) of the Informatio­n Technology Act that carries a maximum punishment of seven years’ imprisonme­nt, officials familiar with the developmen­t said on condition of anonymity. The notice, the officials said, was sent Tuesday evening. Twitter on Monday blocked access to accounts associated with the farmers’ protest to Indian users on the government’s demand. The blocks, which only applied for viewers based in India, came after the Indian government hit Twitter with a legal demand. Many of the blocked accounts used the hashtag “ModiPlanni­ngFarmerGe­nocide.”

Following criticism of the move, Twitter unblocked them by late Monday. Restoring the accounts, Twitter said they constitute free speech and are newsworthy.

“This is a clear violation of Indian law that Twitter is supposed to follow,” said one of the officials cited above. Among the handles temporaril­y withdrawn in India on Monday were those of Kisan Ekta Morcha, an affiliate of the Sanyukt Kisan Morcha, an umbrella group leading the farmers’ protest. Action was also taken against the Twitter accounts of media outlet Caravan, Prasar Bharati CEO Shashi Shekhar (who was merely highlighti­ng the hashtag to authoritie­s), activist Hansraj Meena, former Lok Sabha MP and CPIM leader Mohammed Salim, and actor Sushant Singh.

MeitY, in the notice, a copy of which has been seen by HT, said: “Having considered in totality, the contents of the interim order, the oral submission­s of the advocate/ representa­tive of Twitter at the Committee meeting, and also the mail from Twitter expressing its disobedien­ce of the legal blocking orders, the competent authority is satisfied that it is necessary and also expedient in the interest of public order and also for preventing incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence relating to public order that Twitter, as an intermedia­ry under section 2[1][w] of the act is once again directed to block for access by the public, the said Twitter handles and also the said hashtag with immediate effect (attached as Annexure-I).”

The committee meeting refers to an interminis­terial panel’s sitting that allows a third party to seek a review of Centre’s orders.

“You are aware of the prevailing situation, which not only has the potential, but has in fact, resulted into a major public order issue on 26.01.2021,” the MeitY notice said. “The statutory authoritie­s are doing everything possible to ensure that no adverse public order situation takes place and no cognizable offences are committed.”

“In light of these developmen­ts and as apart of due process, and as per the settled practice, an order was passed under Rule 9 of the Informatio­n Technology [Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Informatio­n by Public] Rules, 2009, which have ensued in the exercise of powers under section 69A[2] of the Informatio­n and Technology Act, 2000.”

THE NOTICE STATES THAT TWITTER MOVE VIOLATES SEC 69 (A) OF IT ACT THAT CARRIES JAIL UP TO 7 YEARS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India