Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

Why Katyal not arraigned as accused, court asks CBI

Tells investigat­ing officer to file an affidavit in this regard

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

THE AGENCY, IN ITS PRELIMINAR­Y INQUIRY, HAD TRIED TO ESTABLISH A NEXUS BETWEEN GOVT FUNCTIONAR­IES AND REAL ESTATE COMPANIES

PANCHKULA: Putting CBI yet again in the dock, a special court has asked the investigat­ing officer (IO) of the Gurugram land release case to file an affidavit explaining “how, why and under what circumstan­ces” Amit Katyal, director of a real estate company, M/s Krrish Buildtech, has not been included as an accused in the chargeshee­t.

In the January 11 orders, special judge CBI, Jagdeep Singh, had said that in the chargeshee­t filed by the CBI, there is a specific mention to the effect that “in furtheranc­e of criminal conspiracy entered with Amit Katyal, director of Krrish Buildtech, despite having major discrepanc­ies, accused and former chief town planner JS Redhu dishonestl­y and fraudulent­ly, proposed to seek approval of the government to grant license to the accused company, by releasing notified land of 130 acre from acquisitio­n proceeding­s, thereby caused cheating to the related land owners, HUDA, and the state of Haryana.”

“But in the array of accused, Katyal has not been arraigned as an accused,” the court stated.

The court has directed the IO of the case, deputy superinten­dent Kailash Sahu, to file an affidavit explaining the position in this regard.

Incriminat­ing document recovered during search

The CBI had on July 9, 2019, conducted searches at the office of Krrish Buildtech in New Delhi, an accused in the case and recovered incriminat­ing documents. A CBI spokespers­on said that the agency got hold of 10 incriminat­ing documents from the Jasola office of the real estate company during the search.

CBI officials had said that Krrish Buildtech was one of the biggest beneficiar­ies in the entire episode as about 130 acre, the highest among all realtors, situated across four villages of Nangli Umrapur, Kadarpur, Ulhawas and Maidawas was released from the acquisitio­n for them by the then Congress government.

Official-developer nexus angle probed

The agency, in its preliminar­y enquiry, had tried to establish a nexus between the government functionar­ies and real estate companies, including Krrish Buildtech.

The first informatio­n report (FIR) stated that Krrish Buildtech (now M/s Brahma City Pvt Ltd) had dishonestl­y and fraudulent­ly applied for a license in 2010 on the basis of inadequate documents — defective antedated collaborat­ion agreements, general power of attorney and managed to get it for about 151 acre.

In 2019, CBI had registered a criminal case against former chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda, an official and 15 real estate developers in a case pertaining to release of over 1,300 acre of Gurugram land from acquisitio­n process and grant of colonisati­on license to realtors during the Congress rule between 2009- 12.

The probe was conducted on directions of the Supreme Court.

The then Congress government had in June 2009 issued a notificati­on under Section 4 to acquire 1,407 acre for developing residentia­l Sector 58-63 and commercial Sector 65-67 in Gurugram by the HUDA. But while issuing declaratio­n under Section 6 on June 2, 2010, the total area was reduced to about 800 acre. Finally, the award, dated May 29, 2012. was passed for just 87 acre.

The FIR said that initiation of land acquisitio­n process compelled landowners to sell their land to real estate developers at a lower price and colonisers fraudulent­ly obtained letter of intents on the notified land, causing loss to the landowners and correspond­ing wrongful gain to themselves.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India