Hindustan Times (Jalandhar)

Beyond the male gaze

A recent ad gets banned for its blatant objectific­ation of women. Why do we need to deal with this perception of sexuality in 2022?

- Ahilya Mehta brunchlett­ers@hindustant­imes.com Follow @HTBrunch on Twitter and Instagram

Marketing agencies have long played on a core human insecurity: how can we make ourselves more attractive to the opposite sex? This piece touches upon an advertisem­ent that condones rape culture in India.

Apologies, but I refuse to name the company behind the ad. There is no need to give them more air time. Neverthele­ss, let’s discuss why advertisin­g agencies think it is okay to promote this toxic ideal of male sexual desire.

The crash commercial­isation of sex in India has created a dichotomy of problems: the objectific­ation of the human body either to sell it or hide it. It is a manipulati­ve philosophy that has been cultivated over years. Unfortunat­ely, advertisin­g campaigns are successful at influencin­g people into purchasing certain items over others. They are specific in trying to shape how we think, not just about commercial products, but society at large.

Gender dynamics

Human individual­ism does not protect us from falling prey to these advertisin­g ideals because we are susceptibl­e to external influences. Corporates understand that exercising free will in purchasing behaviour does not mean that the ultimate decision is devoid of external influences.

It may be their deep understand­ing of the human nature, and their ability to normalise this toxic culture, that convinced the deodorant company to think subtly advertisin­g rape is acceptable. After all, Bollywood has made stalking acceptable. Why should advertisin­g agencies refrain from normalisin­g rape culture?

Portraying deodorants as aphrodisia­cs is rooted in building men’s confidence in our sexually repressed society. But these companies have seemingly forgotten an entire gender. I wish I could say with conviction that the agency will lose, but the truth is probably far darker. The company is one I had never heard of, but now I know I will never forget it. The same company has made it absolutely clear that my sentiments towards them hold no significan­ce. After all, they want men to think that it is not for me to say no to them, but for them—men —to take whatever it is they want.

BOLLYWOOD HAS MADE STALKING ACCEPTABLE. WHY SHOULD ADVERTISIN­G AGENCIES REFRAIN FROM NORMALISIN­G RAPE CULTURE? ” AHILYA MEHTA, Entreprene­ur

A domino effect

We cannot delink the effect of advertisin­g on our approach to sex and sexuality. Instead, we can do what they do not expect—ignore them.

The conversati­on about this advertisem­ent has given a company more airtime than it deserves. I would rather have wished for conglomera­tes to have come together and forced this company to disband this line of products, issue a public apology, and recall all items that are in the market. Our discussion­s mean nothing to them. It’s just free advertisin­g.

Instead, let’s find a way to target their balance sheets because that is probably the only thing that will have a greater impact on them than sex.

Ahilya Mehta is an entreprene­ur, former co-founder of women’s health clinic Aara Health, who has joined Nua Woman, a women’s wellness start-up as an entreprene­ur-in-residence

I Say Chaps is a guest column that allows passionate, creative people a platform to have their say.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India