Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Neighbouri­ng states wary

ON EDGE Surroundin­g states wary of contents, wait to find what’s in it for them

- Rahul Karmakar & Sobhapati Samom

Pact raises hopes but other states wary of NSCN-IM pre-condition to integrate Naga-inhabited areas

GUWAHATI/IMPHAL: The peace pact signed between the NDA government and the NSCN-IM on Monday has raised hopes of improving the conflict situation in the northeast, but Nagaland’s neighbours are wary of its content in view of the Naga outfit’s “expansioni­st designs”.

One of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland’s (NSCN-IM) prime preconditi­ons for resolving the peace process was the integratio­n of all Naga-inhabited areas. Referred to as Greater Nagaland, its map includes five hill districts of Manipur, two of Arunachal Pradesh and large swathes of Assam bordering Nagaland.

“We do not object to any peace accord, but it should not disturb our territoria­l integrity or divide the ethnic groups. The centre should remember 2001,” a member of an Imphal-based NGO said, adding that leaders of various organisati­ons would consult for the next course of action after going through what the accord says.

Violence erupted in Manipur in 2001 after the centre agreed to extend the ambit of the 1997 ceasefire with the NSCN-IM to areas beyond Nagaland. Protestors even set the Manipur assembly building ablaze.

The northeast has only one example of a peace pact that has sustained — the Mizoram Accord of 1986 signed between Laldenga’s Mizo National Front and New Delhi. The government earlier signed the Shillong Accord of 1975 with Naga rebels but it was largely rejected and led to the birth of the NSCN in 1980. Political parties and NGOs in Assam felt the accord could have a positive impact on the militancy scenario in the northeast, but are wary the pact only has “Nagarebels’ agenda” in mind. “We do not know the details yet but if the accord ensures lasting peace within the confines of Nagaland, we welcome it whole-heartedly. However, including any disputed part of Assam in the deal is not acceptable,” Pradyut Bordoloi, former minister and Assam government spokespers­on, told HT.

The mood in Nagaland was upbeat but many were guarded without going through the accord’s content. The Naga Students’ Federation said it was early to comment, as did the Naga Hoho—traditiona­l apex body of all Naga tribes — and Nagaland Baptist Church Council (NBCC), which exercises significan­t clout in predominan­tly Christian Nagaland. “Apactendin­g years of hostilitie­s is welcome but we do not know yet what is in it for the Nagas and Nagaland,” Chuba Ozukum, president of Naga Hoho, said. However, some feel a peace deal with the NSCN-IM will not solve the Naga political problem. The traditiona­l body representi­ng the Konyak tribe, for instance, said any peace process cannot leave the NSCN-Khaplang out.

 ?? HT FILE ?? NSCN-K fighters surrender arms in Kohima, after the 2001 ceasefire was finalised.
HT FILE NSCN-K fighters surrender arms in Kohima, after the 2001 ceasefire was finalised.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India