Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

This goes against children’s rights

The new law will increase labour by children and deprive them of education

-

In a country where human rights often clash with economic considerat­ions, many often find it difficult to take an unequivoca­l stand on child labour. They find it difficult to answer a simple but difficult question: Is putting food on the table more important than education or vice versa? Unfortunat­ely, this is a choice many Indians have to make every day and many among them don’t even see anything wrong in sending their children out to work to supplement the family income. In such a challengin­g scenario, it is the duty of the State to spread the safety net wider so that children are not burdened with such duties and families are not forced to send their children to work. In fact, the State, unlike people, does not have the luxury of taking a stand on this: It has to on the right side of the child labour debate. But after 30 years, on Tuesday, when Parliament passed the new child labour law, which claims that it bans all forms of child labour till the age of 14, it turned out to be an “illusion”.

Here’s why it has is being called an “illusion”: The amendment to the Child Labour Prohibitio­n and Regulation Amendment Bill 2016 continues to allow children to be employed in family-based enterprise­s and the employment of children in most hazardous occupation­s like tanning, bangle-making, zari work, carpets, domestic work, e-waste and numerous others that till recently were recognised as hazardous for children will now be permitted. The Bill not only legitimise­s child labour (the definition of ‘family’ is too wide in the Bill) but also reinforces caste-based occupation­s. Since most family-based occupation­s in India are caste-based, the law by allowing children to work in family occupation­s will keep the caste system intact and in a feudal, caste-driven society the worst affected would be Dalits and the marginalis­ed, a ghastly example of which was the beating and humiliatio­n of Dalit youths in Gujarat and Bihar. Although all children are now banned from working in hazardous occupation­s, the 16 occupation­s and 65 processes that were listed as hazardous in the earlier (1986) law have now been replaced by three occupation­s and 29 processes that are in the Factories Act that covers only the organised sector. So now what about children employed in the unorganise­d sector?

Labour and employment Minister Bandaru Dattatreya told Parliament that the exemptions would allow the government to “practicall­y implement” the Act. The government’s duty is to implement laws; it cannot use its inability to do so as an excuse to pass half-baked laws and push India’s children towards a bleak future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India