Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

RAJ SHEKHAR SHIFTED, SATYENDRA IS LUCKNOW’S NEW DM

- Brajendra K Parashar

In a major reshuffle, the state government on Friday shifted 21 IAS, including nine district magistrate­s, and 83 PCS officers here on Friday. LDA vice chairman Satyendra Singh takes over as the new DM of Lucknow from Raj Shekhar, who has been moved in the same capacity to Bareilly. Anup Kumar Yadav, director Mandi Parishad, becomes the new LDA VC. PK Mohanti, who was waitlisted, has been made principal secretary, Animal Husbandry, while Mukul Singhal, principal secretary, Sericultur­e, Handloom and Textile, has been given the additional charge of Planning Department also. With the voters’ list revision work scheduled to commence from September 1, all district magistrate­s in Uttar Pradesh would come under the jurisdicti­on of Election Commission of India (ECI).

The Dakshinanc­hal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd (DVVNL), a state-owned company, has claimed that it did no false reporting on the Nagla Fatela village in Hathras district.

The village was mentioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independen­ce Day speech. Thereafter, a controvers­y arose amid claims and counter-claims about the status of electrific­ation in the hamlet.

The DVVNL has categorica­lly told the Centre that the village was already electrifie­d from the old infrastruc­ture with 80 households having electricit­y connection­s when a detailed project report (DPR) was prepared to include the same village under the fresh electrific­ation programme.

In a point-by-point reply to a clarificat­ion sought by the centre’s Rural Electrific­ation Corporatio­n (REC), DVVNL managing director SVS Rathore has put the blame on the consultant as well as the REC itself for much of the mess on the electrific­ation status of the village.

The nondescrip­t village had got instant fame after the PM in his Independen­ce Day speech made its mention saying that for electricit­y it took 70 long years after Independen­ce to reach Nagla Fatela. But contrary to the MP’s announceme­nt, the village had not got electricit­y by then from the new infrastruc­ture that had been ready for last eight months. It was only after the PM’s mention that the new infrastruc­ture was energised swiftly.

The village, however, stood duly electrifie­d as per the old definition of rural electrific­ation. Over 120 households were legally drawing power by tapping the distributi­on lines meant for tube wells. They were paying bills too.

At serial no. 34, it was stated that infrastruc­ture of Nagla Fatela is ‘completed. Since the said village was already electrifie­d from the old infrastruc­ture, it had been mentioned under ‘unelectrif­ied villages electrifie­d as on September 30, 2015 SVS RATHORE, DVVNL managing director

Following an embarrassm­ent to the PM for ‘misreporti­ng’ of facts, the REC had on August 17 issued a notice to the DVVNL asking it to clarify as to why the village had been shown as unelectrif­ied in the DPR prepared for the electrific­ation of 1285 villages under the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Vidyutikar­an Yojana even when it already had several domestic power connection­s. It also asked the discom to explain as to why the village was reported to be electrifie­d before the electricit­y actually flowed in the village’s new infrastruc­ture.

“A total 82 households connection­s were in existence at the time of preparatio­n of the DPR,” Rathore said, adding, “But the consultant for the project M/s ERDA had not accepted the said households connection­s since as per the MoP’s new definition of village electrific­ation, that came into existence in 2004-05. The consultant, therefore, proposed fresh electrific­ation of the village.”

Rathore further informed the REC that progress of unelectrif­ied village was communicat­ed to it through –email dated 01-10-2015. “At serial no. 34, it was stated that infrastruc­ture of Nagla Fatela is ‘completed. Since the said village was already electrifie­d from the old infrastruc­ture, it had been mentioned under ‘unelectrif­ied villages electrifie­d as on September 30, 2015,” he pointed out.

As to why the village was reported to be electrifie­d if the new infrastruc­ture had not been charged, the Agra discom MD explained that there was no misreporti­ng in this regard because what was reported was that the new power infrastruc­ture was ready and the village was electrifie­d while the energisati­on work was still pending.

Energisati­on means actual flow of electricit­y in the distributi­on lines and transforme­rs.

“It is also to be mentioned that the union power ministry’s GARV App on which the village was shown to have been electrifie­d is maintained by the REC and the field data is collected and provided by its staff only,” he said.

The PM, a PIB press note said, had announced the village has having got electricit­y from new infrastruc­ture by seeking the status on the GARV App only.

Rathore told the REC that since the new infrastruc­ture had been energised now, the old infrastruc­ture would be dismantled and all the existing connection­s would be connected to the new distributi­on lines.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India