Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

IITK ragging: Suspended students to move court

- HT Correspond­ent letters@hindustant­imes.com

KANPUR : The students suspended by the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT-K) for ragging their juniors have decided to move court to challenge the decision of the institute’s senate. The IIT-K had on Monday night suspended 16 students for three years and six others for a year after they found them guilty of ragging their juniors. This was the first decision of its kind in the history of the premier institutio­n.

The students suspended by the Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur (IIT-K) for ragging their juniors have decided to move the court to challenge the decision of the institute’s senate.

A parent of a student said on condition of anonymity that the decision of IIT-K senate was unfortunat­e and taken in haste merely on verbal evidence.

“There is no incriminat­ing evidence against my son. The senate has taken the decision simply on the basis of allegation­s,” he said. “Natural justice requires evidence. In this case, the inquiry committee went by verbal evidences. This decision will spoil the career of our children,” he said, adding many other parents had also decided to move the court to secure a stay on the decision.

The Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (IIT-K) had on Monday night suspended 16 students for three years and six others for a year after they found them guilty of ragging their juniors. This was the first decision of its kind in the history of the premier institutio­n.

The IIT-K’s senate held the third-year students guilty of making their juniors strip and perform objectiona­ble acts. The ragging was recorded on cell phones and circulated on social media groups.

IIT-K’s deputy director Dr Manindra Agarwal said the 16 students were expelled for three years as the charges against them were “extremely serious”.

The senior students will not have the right to appeal for mercy during the expulsion period and can appeal only after the completion of the suspension period and would be allowed to take admission in the course.

In addition, the president and other office-bearers of the student

Natural justice requires evidence. In this case, the inquiry committee went by verbal evidences. This decision will spoil the career of our children A PARENT on decision

gymkhana were removed from their respective posts allegedly for ignoring the complaints.

About 30 junior students had filed a complaint to the dean of student affairs against 50 seniors, saying they were thrashed, abused, and forced to perform objectiona­ble acts on August 20.

The dean of student affairs referred the complaint to the anti-ragging committee for an inquiry and recommenda­tion of punishment.

The committee found the involvemen­t of 24 senior students and recommende­d their terminatio­n from the courses as well as registerin­g a police complaint against them.

Action against the senior students was expedited only after one of the professors wrote about the incident on his blog.

The senate at its extraordin­ary meeting in September suspended the senior students from different discipline­s from the hostel and the ongoing academic session.

Ragging is illegal on campuses but despite interventi­ons from the government and the Supreme Court, fresh college entrants are often subject to days of physical and mental abuse by their seniors.

In 2009, the University Grants Commission set up an anti-ragging helpline after the death of 19-year-old Aman Kachroo, a first-year medical student in Himachal Pradesh.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India