Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

The Pakistan Peoples’ Party is as good as dead

In the fifth decade of its existence, the party founded by Bhutto doesn’t command the influence it once did

- IMTIAZ GUL Imtiaz Gul is an author and heads the Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad The views expressed are personal

Last week the Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP), founded by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto on November 30,1967, turned 50. It was an event that did not reflect the power and importance the party and its founder once held in Pakistan.

On any discussion on the PPP and Bhutto, I recall a small mutiny at a factory in Rawalpindi in 1974, triggered by the new rights that Bhutto had bestowed on workers. The entire staff rose against three top managers, locked them out of the premises and asked the owners to come for negotiatio­ns. They made my father their boss and eventually had the managers removed for their discrimina­tory and dictatoria­l behaviour. It was the beginning of a new era with all the socialist trappings, and it gave the people a sense of being someone.

The nationalis­ation and workers’ empowermen­t drive unlocked the floodgates to unquestion­ed trade unionism, most of whose leaders went haywire while exercising their right to assembly and associatio­n. It played havoc with productivi­ty and with work ethics.

Memories of that social transforma­tion lie deep in the minds of all those who either directly or with this new-found sense of empowermen­t benefited from it. They all saw this as a dividend of their support for the Pakistan Peoples’ Party.

This bonanza for workers, neverthele­ss, came to a grinding halt in July 1977, when General Zia-ul-Haq, handpicked by Bhutto as an ostensibly docile officer to lead the army, staged a coup and eventually executed Bhutto in April 1979.

From then on, General Zia unleashed an unpreceden­ted oppression to decimate the Bhutto legacy through the incarcerat­ion of the PPP’s founding leaders and ideologica­l workers. General Zia, once described as the “general with the eyes of a cobra” by Der Spiegel, spared no effort in undoing what Bhutto had achieved — an enduring love in the mind of the common man for a leader who had given them a sense of empowermen­t, and ownership.

Today, for most Pakistanis, Bhutto’s legacy is as good as dead. What lives on is the name of Bhutto, in Benazir Bhutto’s son – Bilawal Bhutto Zardari – an act derided by many Pakistanis because this runs contrary to the centuries-old tradition where the son carries only the father’s name.

Badly battered in the 2013 general elections, the PPP today lives under the shadows of Asif Ali Zardari, who once was informally referred to as ‘Mr10 per cent’.

Zardari consciousl­y cashed in his spouse’s surname, always initiating his speeches and statements with it. However, at no time during his presidency did Zardari institute a formal enquiry to investigat­e Benazir’s assassinat­ion.

“[Asif Ali] Zardari achieved in just five years what a dictator like General Zia-ulHaq and his successors couldn’t do through their brutal repression of the PPP for nearly two decades,” says former PPP senator Enver Baig.

Ishaq Khan Khakwani, a politician who hosted Zulfikar Ali Bhutto several times in his ancestral house in Vehari, believes Benazir’s second tenure as prime minister (19931996) essentiall­y marked the beginning of PPP’s degenerati­on into a typical status quo party – led by landed aristocrac­y and moneyed people. Besides elevating her husband as federal minister for investment in 1995, she also began vying for “contingenc­y funds for future campaigns”.

Sherry Rehman, a vice president of the PPP, and a close associate of Benazir, feels that Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s legacy is relevant to today’s Pakistan, where social inequaliti­es and economic vulnerabil­ity define the lives of many Pakistanis. “His vision was quite transforma­tive in that it spoke to big ideas that don’t go away: the attempt to level social pyramids, the emancipati­on of women, the building of Pakistan’s leadership on foreign policy fronts, the politics of hope for the bottom of the pyramid.”

Yet the reality on ground today hardly takes into account what Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Benazir stood for. The party is in disarray, in public led by the unimpressi­ve political novice Bilawal. He hardly connects with the common man. This is especially true with the youth in Pakistan, whose primary concern is a weak economy, and who care little for today’s shallow political rhetoric, or the thunderous revolution­ary speeches of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.

THE PARTY IS IN DISARRAY, IN PUBLIC LED BY THE UNIMPRESSI­VE POLITICAL NOVICE BILAWAL BHUTTO. HE HARDLY CONNECTS WITH THE COMMON MAN.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India