Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Aadhaar body refuses informatio­n on money spent on publicity

- Sarika Malhotra sarika.malhotra@htlive.com

NEWDELHI: The Unique Identifica­tion Authority of India (UIDAI) has declined to divulge details of the money it spent on advertisin­g and promoting the 12-digit biometrics-based identifica­tion number, Aadhaar, over the past eight years, according to economist Reetika Khera, who had filed an applicatio­n under the Right to Informatio­n Act seeking the aforementi­oned details.

In her applicatio­n dated November 15, 2017, Khera had sought the list of enrolment agencies empanelled since the creation of UIDAI in 2009 and the amount spent in each financial year for each agency. The UIDAI responded on January 3, 2018, but refused to divulge the details of expenses incurred on advertisin­g and promotion. HT has a copy of the RTI applicatio­n and the UIDAI’s response.

UIDAI’s chief executive officer (CEO), deputy director general (media), assistant director general (ADG) and central public informatio­n officers (CPIO) did not respond to e-mails seeking their comment. Himanshu, associate professor in Economics at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, JNU, said: “There is no reason why the government should be guarded about sharing this basic informatio­n. It is not a state secret that may have any harmful ramificati­ons. After all, public money is being used for this makeover and branding.”

The UIDAI also did not spell out the reason for its refusal and mentioned Section 8(1)’s clauses D and J of the RTI Act as reasons for not giving the informatio­n.

The two clauses rule that an informatio­n officer can reject an applicatio­n if it seeks informatio­n including commercial confidence, trade secrets and intellectu­al property, “the disclosure of which would harm the competitiv­e position of a third party”; and personal informatio­n, “the disclosure of which has no relationsh­ip to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarrante­d invasion of the privacy of the individual”.

The RTI applicatio­n was filed based on news reports from July 2014, which claimed that the UIDAI had received a go-ahead from the government to spend up to ~30 crore a year on “image makeover” and “branding campaigns” for Aadhaar. A 2010 memorandum of the Planning Commission had said vendors and agencies would be requisitio­ned by the UIDAI to execute marketing and communicat­ion campaigns on the ground.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India