Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Collegium meets candidates for HC judge posts

- Ashok Bagriya letters@hindustant­imes.com ▪

NEW DELHI: Seeking to improve the process of selecting the judges of the high court, the Supreme Court collegium this week informally interviewe­d lawyers whose names had been cleared for appointmen­t to make sure they were right for the job.

Judges with knowledge of the meeting confirmed that the candidates had been called to the Supreme Court for an interactio­n with the top three judges who make up the collegiums, which is responsibl­e for clearing appointmen­ts of judges to the high courts.

“This is the first time every lawyer whose name has been cleared for high court judgeship was called for an informal chat with the collegium. The idea was to get an overview of the person, assess his personalit­y and see if the person is conversant in the language,” one judge said.

The prospectiv­e high court judges — five from West Bengal and another five from Madhya Pradesh — were called to the Supreme Court on March 26 for the interactio­n, aimed at assessing the merit and suitabilit­y of the candidates for the job.

Potential judges are recommende­d to the SC collegium by the states to which they belong. The collegium, which presently consists of chief justice Dipak Misra, justice J. Chelameswa­r and justice Ranjan Gogoi, also scrutinise­s the state chief minister’s views on the candidates, forwarded by the governor. They also receive Intelligen­ce reports and observatio­ns by the department of justice.

After the informal interactio­n with the advocates, the SC collegium recommende­d the appointmen­t of Biswajit Basu, . Amrita Sinha, Sutanu Kumar Patra, Abhijit Gangopadhy­ay, and Jay Sengupta as judges of the Cal- cutta high court. It suggested the appointmen­t of Sanjay Dwivedi, Akhil Kumar Shrivastav­a, Brij Kishore Shrivastav­a, Rajendra Kumar Shrivastav­a, and Mohd. Fahim Anwar to the Madhya Pradesh high court,

Senior advocate Jaideep Gupta said the collegium’s move to interact with candidates before appointmen­ts was a “a good and a welcome move.”

“This kind of an interactio­n provides the collegium an opportunit­y to know the persons who are being appointed as judges. Previously, in a majority of the cases the collegium had very little opportunit­y of knowing these persons,” Gupta added.

This developmen­t comes at a time when a memorandum of procedure (MOP) on the appointmen­t of judges is pending.

On December 16, 2015, a constituti­on bench of the SC headed by justice JS Khehar, who retired as chief justice in August last year, directed the government to finalise a new MOP in consultati­on with the CJI to replace the current one and listed suggestion­s to improve the collegium system of appointmen­t.

The new appointmen­ts will take the number of Calcutta high court judges to 35 against the total strength of 72. In the Madhya Pradesh high court, the number of judges will go up to 40, still short of a sanctioned strength of 53.

 ?? HT FILE ?? ▪ Justice Jasti Chelameswa­r and Justice Ranjan Gogoi.
HT FILE ▪ Justice Jasti Chelameswa­r and Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India