Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Hanging best option in death sentence: Centre

KEY DEBATE Tells SC in reply to PIL seeking to abolish the method

- Bhadra Sinha letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Hanging was a safe and quick method to carry out a death sentence, the Centre has told Supreme Court in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) that says the practice violates the right to die with dignity.

Making the execution “overly comfortabl­e” would bring down the deterrent effect of a death sentence, the home ministry has said in an affidavit seen by the Hindustan Times. Other means such as lethal injection or a firing squad could be more barbaric and inhumane, it says, adding death sentence is awarded in the rarest of rare cases of abhorrent and barbaric acts.

Advocate Rishi Malhotra’s PIL wants execution by hanging abolished and also wants the court to declare the right to die by a dignified procedure a fundamenta­l right under Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constituti­on.

Section 354(5) of the criminal procedure code says a convict be hanged by the neck till death.

The Centre requested the court not to entertain the PIL, saying the issue was sensitive and a matter of legislativ­e policy.

The apex court, it pointed out, had in an earlier judgment upheld Section 354(5), finding it in conformity with Article 21.

The judgment, it said, had looked at different methods such as an electric chair, firing squad and lethal injection in use in other parts of the world and found hanging the most suitable mode of execution.

Hanging, the affidavit says, is “free from anything that would unnecessar­ily sharpen the poignancy of the prisoner’s apprehensi­on”.

Chances of accidents could be safely excluded as well as the possibilit­y of a lingering death. “Unconsciou­sness supervenes almost instantane­ously after the process is set in motion and death follows,” says the affidavit.

The Centre said the law commission report that favoured lethal injection did not take into account the possibilit­y that medical profession­als were unlikely to participat­e in an execution, or that the chemical used could fail.

There were also problems of finding the right vein, right doses and other complicati­ons.

 ??  ?? PIL says the practice violates the right to die with dignity
PIL says the practice violates the right to die with dignity

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India