Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Data localisati­on norms can hurt a nation’s GDP

The Reserve Bank directive relating to the payment industry could impact the vision of cashless India

- SUDHIR GUPTA KAUSH MAHAN Sudhir Gupta is former secretary, TRAI, and honorary principal adviser, Broadband India Forum. Kaushal Mahan is a technology policy analyst. The views expressed are personal

If the 20th century brought the promise of the Internet as a decentrali­sed and selfregula­ting space, the 21st century is marked by battles over the control of data. There are many permutatio­ns in data localisati­on laws; however, they require data to be processed within a particular territory or country as opposed to in a cloud. Apart from storage, regulation­s might also restrict data from being transmitte­d outside a territory. Many countries have announced or have already put in place data localisati­on norms: Vietnam, Indonesia, Brunei, Iran, China, Brazil, India, Australia, Korea, Nigeria and, most recently, Russia.

These regulation­s are alarming for several reasons. First, it increases cost for companies. Second, data localisati­on restrictio­ns can negatively impact GDP of countries mandating it. Third, such policies often seen as a tool to enable local surveillan­ce. Fourth, they also increase the cyber vulnerabil­ity and restrict access of SMEs to global services.

Data localisati­on laws often do not mandate a blanket localisati­on of data. Europe’s new data protection regime does not introduce localisati­on requiremen­ts but instead puts limits on cross-border data flows to countries that don’t have data protection laws.

In 2017, the government constitute­d the Justice BN Srikrishna committee to draft a data protection law. While the panel is yet to finalise its recommenda­tions, the Reserve Bank of India, in April, stated that “all system providers shall ensure that the entire data relating to payment systems operated by them are stored in a system only in India”. Their objective is to ensure “unfettered supervisor­y access to data stored with these system providers as also with their service providers/ intermedia­ries/ third party vendors and other entities in the payment ecosystem”.

The goal of access to data is understand­able from the regulator’s perspectiv­e; however, there are better mechanisms to achieve this. Importantl­y, once India has a robust data protection law in place, personal data of Indian residents, wherever stored, will be bound to comply with requiremen­ts of ensuring security and access to data by law enforcemen­t and users. However, in the context of the RBI directive for payment system operators, ironically most of them do not see or store the personal data of consumers. The Reserve Bank of India directive without any industry consultati­on will undermine the required support from the global industry to achieve the vision of a cashless India. Increased compliance cost and additional reporting requiremen­t will foresee a decrease in investment in the payment industry in India.

 ?? REUTERS ?? ▪ Once India has a robust data protection law, the personal data of Indian residents will be bound to comply with the requiremen­ts of security and access to law enforcemen­t.
REUTERS ▪ Once India has a robust data protection law, the personal data of Indian residents will be bound to comply with the requiremen­ts of security and access to law enforcemen­t.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India