Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

GST cheer for govt as states’ shortfall drops

- Sudhi Ranjan Sen letters@hindustant­imes.com ▪

NEW DELHI: Amid a sense of doom and gloom spread by the falling rupee, rising oil prices and widening current account deficit, the government has at least one reason to cheer: compensati­on due to state government­s for loss of revenue stemming from introducti­on of the goods and services tax (GST) in July 2017 is dropping sharply.

Latest calculatio­ns by the ministry of finance show the shortfall in revenue of states

› The gap — shortfall in revenue of states — is likely to reduce even more in the days to come

AN OFFICIAL

because of GST, or compensati­on due to the states from the Centre, stands at around ₹4,500 crore a month on an average against the ₹5,300 crore paid in the same period last year, officials with knowledge of the matter said.

Last year, when India moved to the one-nation-one-tax regime, the Centre promised to compensate individual states for any loss of revenue from the introducti­on of GST, which subsumed a raft of indirect levies.

North Block is in the process of completing an exercise to calculate the amount due to states. The figures are startling.

Compared to ₹48,000 crore paid last year (for the period from July 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018) to states as compensati­on for revenue loss, this year (April to July) the Centre has had to pay about ₹18,000 crore, or ₹4,500 crore, a month.

“The gap — shortfall in revenue of states — is likely to reduce even more in the days to come,” an official involved in the process said, asking not to be identified.

The improvemen­t is an indication of a widening tax base and that the initial glitches in implementi­ng the indirect tax regime are behind the government.

Additional steps to boost revenue collection may lead the shortfall to narrow further.

“The inherent characteri­stic of GST is that it would result in tax buoyancy. This buoyancy would not only come from widening of the tax base but also from imported compliance and competitiv­eness of trade and industry. So, therefore, it would be but natural to expect the requiremen­t of compensati­on to States for loss of revenue going down from year to year,” Shaktikant­a Das, the former Union economic affairs and revenue secretary and member of the 15 Finance Commission, said.

Among other things, the introducti­on of electronic waybills (e-way-bills) — an electronic documentat­ion detailing the movement of goods above a certain amount — has led to increased transparen­cy and better collection­s.

Documents prepared by the GST Council, which is overseeing the implementa­tion of the indirect tax regime, reveal that the number of entities filing tax has slowly grown. In December 2017, about 66% of the entities had enrolled under the regime filed their returns. Subsequent­ly, the numbers dipped. But by for July, 2018, 68% of entities filed their returns.

“The compensati­on amount has reduced due to better implementa­tion, widening of tax base and better implementa­tion. It has resulted in better revenue collection. It is expected that state government­s will take more steps to boost their revenue collection further which would further reduce the amount compensati­on from the centre in the near future,” additional director general (media and communicat­ion), DS Malik, said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India