Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Why BSP should shift from sarvajan’ to ‘bahujan’

- AJEET KUMAR PANKAJ (The writer is assistant professor at department of social work, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak, MP. Views expressed are personal.)

The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), traditiona­lly identified as a party with large-scale support from Dalits, OBCs and minorities that constitute ‘Bahujan’ in political discourse, was known for its radical stand against caste-based social discrimina­tion and atrocities on bahujans.

BSP labelled the upper caste groups and other mainstream political parties as ‘manuwadi’.

However, since 2005-07 it changed its position and started wooing upper caste groups for political support.

The party attracted a large upper caste support, particular­ly Brahmins, during the 2007 assembly election in Uttar Pradesh with a popular appeal for ‘sarvajan hitay, sarwajan sukhay’.

The slogan was a clear indication that the BSP was no longer associated only with Dalit vote base, rather it expanded its ideologica­l inclinatio­n from ‘bahujan to sarvajan’.

Importantl­y, Mayawati strongly conveyed the message during her campaigns, party meetings, and in media conference­s, that the Bahujan Samaj Party is the party for ‘sarvajan’ and it promises to work for all people, irrespecti­ve of caste and religious identity.

However, continuous defeats of the BSP in electoral politics and shrinking support of upper caste entails that the party must shift its political position from ‘sarvajan to bahujan’.

FROM ZENITH TO NADIR

Though the Bahujan Samaj Party won the assembly election in 2007, it lost badly in the 2012 assembly polls, followed by the 2014 parliament­ary election.

The party experience­d from being an absolute majority party in 2007 UP assembly election to getting zero seats in the national election of 2014, which was quite shocking and surprising for many because BSP holds a distinct social base in UP.

In the 2017 UP elections, the BSP emerged as the secondlarg­est political party in terms of vote share with 22.23% of total vote share but could win only 19 legislativ­e seats, which was surprising for many.

Since 2007, the vote share dropped up to more than 5% and the number of legislativ­e seats dropped from 206 to 80 in 2012 and subsequent­ly in 2017 assembly election dropped from 80 to 19 seats.

Apart from UP, the BSP also has significan­t support in Uttarakhan­d, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Punjab but gradually it is losing ground in these states as well.

WAY FORWARD FOR BSP

The BSP had made an appeal at various party forums to give reservatio­n to the upper caste poor.

The party’s stand in favour of reservatio­n for upper caste poor is against the fundamenta­l base of reservatio­n policy and it is causing anger and dissatisfa­ction among Dalits.

The party’s cold response on Una caste atrocities, Saharanpur atrocities with Dalits, Bhim Koregaon issues and remark of Mayawati about Bhim Army’s Chandrashe­khar Azad Ravan’s affiliatio­n with RSS are additional factors, which are causing anger and dissatisfa­ction among Dalits and minorities.

‘Bahujan-SCs, STs, OBCs, and minorities’ share approximat­ely over 80% of India’s total population and the BSP was significan­tly representi­ng them in the political discourse, then what was the need for the party to appease Brahmins and upper castes?

It has been a trend that upper caste support has never been associated with a single party; traditiona­lly it was with the Congress but shifted to the BJP with the emergence of Hindutva politics during the 1990s.

And when the BJP was on the decline in UP, shifted to the BSP during 2007 assembly election and again came back to BJP since 2014.

Therefore, instead of focusing on upper caste support, the Bahujan Samaj Party should focus on its traditiona­l support base – Dalits, OBCs, and minorities or the ‘Bahujan’, because it shares the largest population and the foundation of BSP lies in ‘Bahujan’ only.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India