Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Fewer women MLAs find place in Raj, MP assemblies this time

- Gilles Verniers letters@hindustant­imes.com ▪ Gilles Verniers is Assistant Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Trivedi Centre for Political Data, Ashoka University

NEW DELHI : A fewer number of women will join the newly elected assemblies of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, as poll results indicate a dip in female representa­tion since 2013. This is because of a poor distributi­on of tickets by the main parties, as well as a false notion that women make weaker candidates. For a country that ranks 149th among 205 nations in terms of women’s representa­tion in its national assembly, this does not augur well. Women make up for less than 8% of the legislator­s across all state assemblies.

In comparison to the 2013 state elections, the November-December state polls do not show an improvemen­t. Across five states, 685 women contested (not inclusive of kinnar, or transwomen candidates), although only a third — 219 — did so from main parties. At the end, only 63 won or roughly 9% of the 678 newly elected legislator­s. Two states that have been, in recent times, above the national average — Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh (14% and 13% in the previous assemblies, respective­ly) — saw a decrease of women’s representa­tion in the assembly. There is small progress in Chhattisga­rh. Women were almost absent from the contest in Telangana, with only 38 tickets distribute­d to women among the main parties. In Mizoram, the lone woman MLA, Er. Lalrinawma, retained the seat of Tuikum which she won in 2013.

PARTIES ARE TO BLAME

In Rajasthan, 179 women contested the 2018 polls, 71 on a main party ticket (Bharatiya Janata Party, Congress, Bahujan Samaj Party or Aam Aadmi Party). Twenty-three were elected, nearly all from Congress or BJP. Over time, the share of women among the candidates has increased marginally from 2% of the tickets in 1990 to 8% in 2018.

The progressio­n in the number of women MLAs does not depend solely on their presence as candidates, but also on the number of tickets given by major parties. Starting in 2008, the BJP and the Congress started distributi­ng slightly more tickets to women, which led to a rise of women’s representa­tion in 2008 and 2013. In 2018, the BJP distribute­d 23 tickets to women — three fewer than it did in 2013, while

the Congress, with 25 tickets, gave one more than it did in the previous election.

In Madhya Pradesh, the 2018 election marked a departure from a long-term upward trend in women’s representa­tion. There are 10 fewer women in the assembly compared to five years ago (30 in the previous assembly). This time around, 10 women won on a BJP ticket, 9 on a Congress ticket. One of the two BSP MLAs is Rambai Govind Singh, in Pathariya.

Carole Spary’s work on women’s representa­tion in national politics in India (Performing Representa­tion: Women Members in the Indian Parliament) reveals that in the face of competitio­n, parties are reluctant to distribute many tickets to women deemed to be ‘weak’ or ‘weaker’ candidates. Sensing a tough election ahead, the BJP cut the number of tickets given to women candidates, from 22 in 2013 to 10 in 2018, in Madhya Pradesh. The Congress fared no better, giving nine tickets to women against the six it gave five years earlier. The combinatio­n of poor distributi­on and poor performanc­e of the BJP explains the dip in women’s representa­tion.

SLOW PROGRESS

The data for Chhattisga­rh seem to indicate a gradual increase in both, women candidatur­e and representa­tion. Given the small size of the assembly (90 seats), we are really talking about more women fielded and elected in each election. Generally speaking, one should be cautious handling representa­tion statistics when the numbers are so small. Consequent­ly, women’s representa­tion in Chhattisga­rh is actually quite stable.

In Mizoram, Er. Lalrinawma, from Tuikum, retained the first seat won by a woman in that state since 1987. Despite a substantia­l increase in the number of women candidates, voters in Mizoram still tend to reject women contestant­s, as is the case in most of the Northeast.

Barely a handful of women candidates (6) made it to the three assemblies that went to the polls in the region in 2017. In Tripura, Nagaland and Meghalaya, not only do parties discrimina­te against women candidates, but voters also contribute to the marginaliz­ation of women by giving them lower vote shares.

SETBACK TO THE CAUSE

Overall, the situation is not bright. If political parties’ reaction to increased competitiv­eness is to reduce the already small space left for women politician­s, this does not augur well for the 2019 national elections.

Parties are guided by false notions that women make weaker candidates; an analysis of their relative vote share and strike rate indicate that it is not the case and even often quite the contrary. The marginalis­ation of women in elected assemblies comes as a contradict­ion to the greater involvemen­t of women in elections — as voters, or as part of the Panchayat.

The improvemen­t of women’s representa­tion does not depend solely on parties. Like in the neighbouri­ng state of Haryana, the better representa­tion of women has to do in part with the prominence of dynastic politics, which draws a number of women into politics. But their candidatur­e and participat­ion in Panchayats and municipali­ties puts paid to the notion that political backing alone will help.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India