Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

‘PC, Karti met Mukerjeas, officials buried violations’

- Neeraj Chauhan and Richa Banka letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEWDELHI:The Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI), in its charge sheet in the INX Media case filed on Friday, has said two meetings of Indrani Mukerjea and Pratim (Peter) Mukerjea -- the first with former finance minister P Chidambara­m in his office at North Block sometime in April/May 2007, and the second with the minister’s son Karti Chidambara­m at Hyatt hotel in June 2008 -- are at the centre of bribery allegation­s against the father and son.

Around the time, the Mukerjeas were looking for foreign investment for their media company in 2007; they, along with senior journalist Vir Sanghvi (the editor of their venture) met P Chidambara­m at his office in North Block seeking FIPB approval. That the meeting happened, CBI says in the charge sheet reviewed by HT, is corroborat­ed by records of the Mukerjeas’ stay at Hotel Oberoi in Delhi for the relevant period and their taxi bill for travel. In the finance minister’s own official visitors’ log, CBI adds, the meeting “has been weeded out”.

Sanghvi, who has not been named as an accused and is a witness in the case, told HT, “I have given evidence to CBI. It has asked me not to talk about the meeting.”

A Delhi court on Monday took cognisance of the CBI charge sheet, which lists the entire sequence of events, and summoned Chidambara­m on October 24. The court also summoned all the other accused, including Chidambara­m’s son Karti and bureaucrat­s in the finance department, on November 29.

Chidambara­m’s lawyer and Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi said: “A charge sheet by definition is the prosecutio­n’s proposal to prosecute. It is neither an interim nor a final judicial finding. None of these wild allegation­s have been proved remotely. What is important is, firstly, that the charge sheet doesn’t even make a charge or not even an allegation of tampering with evidence or witnesses. Hence, the prosecutio­n has falsely made this accusation to deny him bail. The charge sheet usually signifies completion of investigat­ion. On that ground too, he should get bail.” CBI states that in his meeting with Mukerjeas, the senior Congress leader asked them to pay “illegal gratificat­ion in the form of overseas pay-offs... [and] demanded that business interest(s) of his son should be taken care of”. INX’s proposal for ~4.62 crore foreign direct investment­s (FDI) was cleared on May 18, 2007, by P Chidambara­m. Following this, INX received ~403.07 crore, about 90 times the approved amount from three foreign investors by selling shares at the rate of ~862.15 each instead of the originally proposed price of ~10 per equity. “FIPB approval for receipt of excess FDI was neither applied for by INX Media not asked for by the concerned public servants,” CBI said in the charge sheet..

The company also allegedly transferre­d ~40.91 crore illegally as downstream investment from INX Media to INX News Pvt Ltd between 2007 and 2008. The downstream investment proposal, which was submitted by INX after receiving the money, was approved by P Chidambara­m on October 20, 2008.

Several complaints about these investment­s were made by several former MPs, including Avinash Rai Khanna and Murli Manohar Joshi, the charge sheet goes on to add. The then informatio­n and broadcasti­ng minister in the UPA government, Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi, too had forwarded a complaint to department of revenue about irregulari­ties by INX and Chidambara­m himself was aware of those complaints, it says. Vir Sanghvi, too, brought the matter of irregulari­ties in INX News to the notice of P Chidambara­m in February 2008, CBI says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India