Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

CPI (Maoist) 6th deadliest terror outfit in world: US report

- Neeraj Chauhan ■ neeraj.chauhan@hindustant­imes.com

NEWDELHI: A US State Department report has described the Communist Party of India (Maoist) as the world’s sixth deadliest terror organisati­on while ranking India as the fourth worst terrorism-hit country, where 57% terrorist incidents last year were reported from Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).

In its Country Report on Terrorism 2018 released on Friday, the State Department has blamed Communist Party of India (Maoist) for the killing of 311 people last year in 177 terror incidents even as the Union home ministry data shows there were 240 deaths in 833 violent incidents involving the group in 2018.

It has ranked the CPI (Maoist) as the deadliest terror organisati­on globally after the Taliban (Afghanista­n), IS or the so-called Islamic State, Al-Shabaab (Africa), Boko Haram (Africa) and the Communist Party of the Philippine­s. It ranked India as the fourth most terror-hit country globally after Afghanista­n, Syria and Iraq. It noted that “weaknesses in intelligen­ce and informatio­n sharing negatively impacted state and central law enforcemen­t agencies” in countering terror in India.

“CPI-Maoist [also called Naxals] was the main perpetrato­r of [terror] incidents in India in 2018, responsibl­e for 176 [26% of all] incidents. Jaish-e-Mohammed [JeM] was responsibl­e for 60 [9% of all] incidents. Hizbul Mujahideen was responsibl­e for 59 [9% of all] incidents while Lashkar-e Tayyiba [LeT] was responsibl­e for 55 [8% of] incidents...Other groups, such as the United Liberation Front of Assam, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah, and ISIS-Jammu and Kashmir were also active in India,” it added.

The report said that Pakistanba­sed LeT, which was responsibl­e for the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and JeM maintained the “capa

THE REPORT RANKED INDIA AS THE FOURTH MOST TERROR-HIT COUNTRY GLOBALLY AFTER AFGHANISTA­N, SYRIA AND IRAQ

bility and intent” to attack Indian and Afghan targets.

On February 27, Indian Air Force fighters flew deep into Pakistan to bomb a terror facility in retaliatio­n to JeM’s February 14 bombing in J&K’s Pulwama that killed 40 CRPF troopers.

Interestin­gly, 37% of terror incidents in India were not attributed to a specific group, according to the US State Department report. The Department studies terrorism incidents, trends and government policies globally for the annual report based on the data it collects on its own.

Union home ministry officials refused to comment on why India’s data on deaths in the Maoist violence was different from that of the US. But an official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said: “The US… data almost shows the same trend as ours usually. The Indian government has taken numerous steps in its fight against terror in the last few years.”

Another ministry official, who also asked not to be named, insisted that there has been better coordinati­on between states and central agencies in countering terror in the last five to six years.

The State Department report says terrorism affected all 29 Indian states in 2018 and that 971 people were killed in the 671 attacks last year.

It added Chhattisga­rh was the worst-hit after J&K with 111 incidents (16%) in 2018 followed by Manipur with by 22 (3%). It added that 386 terror incidents across India in 2018 were reported from

J&K. The report noted that the rapid response capabiliti­es of India’s counter-terrorism unit National Security Guard (NSG) is limited due to its smaller size.

HT tried to reach officials, including NSG’s public relations officer, for comments but they were unavailabl­e.

Internal security expert Ajai Sahni said that NSG’s rapid response capability is obviously limited because of its presence in four or five hubs like Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Kolkata or its deployment at some airports.

In response to the reference in the report to India’s weaknesses related to the intelligen­ce gathering, Sahni added: “Our national intelligen­ce gathering and capability for technical backup is extremely poor.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India