Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Group of urban experts write to Centre over Central Vista project

Green assessment and public hearing a must, says collective of architects, environmen­talists and urban designers

- Anisha Dutta anisha.dutta@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Cumulative impact assessment and a public hearing are a must for the Central Vista redevelopm­ent plan, a collective of about 300 architects, environmen­talists and urban designers have said in a letter to union environmen­t minister Prakash Javadekar.

The letter comes days after the union ministry housing and urban affairs’ constructi­on arm, the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) sought environmen­tal clearance to build a new Parliament building.

The letter, written by a collective of urban planners and environmen­talists, LokPATH, a copy of which has been seen by Hindustan Times, alleges that the Centre’s report categorisi­ng it in the ‘individual category 8 (A) of building and constructi­on projects’ violates environmen­t ministry rules for ‘considerat­ion of integrated and interrelat­ed projects for grant of environmen­tal clearance’.

The CPWD has sought clearance for one component of the Central Vista project—the expansion and renovation of the existing Parliament building —from the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) on Infrastruc­ture.

“We are disappoint­ed that a massive redevelopm­ent that impacts heritage, public space and the environmen­t is being considered as a routine building and a constructi­on project, without full disclosure, cumulative impact assessment­s of all the integrated components and no public hearing,” it said.

The ministry of housing and urban affairs did not respond to requests for a comment.

According to norms, environmen­t clearance is necessary for a few categories of constructi­on projects and area developmen­t projects under Environmen­tal Impact Assessment (EIA) norms. The EIA Notificati­on, 2006, mandates prior environmen­tal clearance for new projects or activities, including expansion or modernisat­ion of existing projects listed in its schedule. The ‘A’ category projects, require prior environmen­tal clearance from the central government in the Ministry of Environmen­t and Forests (MoEF) on the recommenda­tions of an EAC. The Centre estimates the new building will cost about Rs 770 crore and lead to the cutting down of 194 trees.

The letter states that the Centre’s applicatio­n treats the expansion of Parliament as a standalone project despite being a part of the proposed redevelopm­ent of the Central Vista. “The redevelopm­ent of Central Vista has been publicised as one project by the MoHUA. The consultanc­y for the entire project was contracted to one consultant, HCP Design, Planning and Management Pvt. Ltd., in October 2019. Yet the Parliament expansion is being treated as a stand-alone project for the purposes of environmen­tal clearance,” it said.

The letter says CPWD’s claim identifyin­g the project as belonging to category 8 (A) is “misleading and deliberate­ly underplays the impact of the project by singling out specific components of an integrated project.” It says the category allows the applicatio­n to be exempt from a detailed EIA and a public hearing.

“...We would like to bring to your attention that while exemptions exist in the EIA Notificati­on,

2006, the law does not summarily prohibit the need to conduct public hearing/ consultati­on in cases where projects involve significan­t environmen­tal and social impact,” the letter says.

It says a precedent has been set in an instance when the environmen­t ministry directed a public hearing to be carried out for the proposed Peddar Road Flyover in Mumbai, which was also categorise­d under ‘category 8’ of the schedule of projects, same as the present applicatio­n for Parliament’s expansion.

“In the case of the Peddar Road Flyover, the ministry responded to the concerns of citizens and directed that the public hearing be conducted to ascertain citizen’s views on the project,” it said.

LokPATH alleged that the Centre’s applicatio­n for Parliament expansion contains false and misleading informatio­n. It urged the environmen­t ministry to direct the EAC to reject the current proposal in its entirety, direct CPWD to disclose all the components of the integrated project and conduct a cumulative environmen­tal impact assessment.

 ?? HT ARCHIVE ?? ■
The CPWD has sought clearance for one component of the Central Vista project—the expansion and renovation of the existing Parliament building.
HT ARCHIVE ■ The CPWD has sought clearance for one component of the Central Vista project—the expansion and renovation of the existing Parliament building.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India